UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Heat Exchanger Operating Conditions<br />
An Experiment was conducted in order to<br />
determine the optimum placement of the<br />
heat exchanger within the exhaust.<br />
Thermocouples were inserted in both the<br />
exhaust manifold and the stack to measure<br />
the difference in temperature and time taken<br />
to reach steady state conditions.<br />
Cameron Adams<br />
Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
The Conceptual Design and Development of a Steam Powered Rankine<br />
Cycle for the Energy Recovery of Exhaust Gases<br />
Concept Designs for Heat Exchangers<br />
Two different heat exchanger designs were completed, in order to account for the difference in thermal<br />
and dimensional restrictions imposed at the potential mounting positions. An NTU-Effectiveness<br />
calculation was then undertaken in order to determine the best heat exchanger design for the job, with<br />
the counter flow achieving an effectiveness of 69.5% compared with the 37.6% achieved by the crossflow<br />
.<br />
Design 1 – Counter-Flow<br />
Design 2 – Cross-Flow<br />
Project Supervisor : Dr. Rohitha Weerasinghe<br />
Project summary<br />
The Purpose of this investigation is to analyse the<br />
feasibility of the implementation of a steam powered<br />
Rankine cycle within a standard automobile exhaust.<br />
This report uses existing research accompanied with<br />
experimental and simulation techniques in order to<br />
provide validation of the thermodynamic cycle and its<br />
application within a petrol fuelled exhaust.<br />
Two designs are proposed and evaluated for the<br />
evaporation stage of the cycle; resulting in a final<br />
design being chosen. This design was then developed<br />
by theoretical calculation and simulation, evaluating<br />
the incurred pressure-drop across the component.<br />
System analysis is then completed in order to<br />
optimise the cycle and thermal efficiencies based on<br />
the specified design of the heat exchanger.<br />
Project Objectives<br />
Temperature (°C)<br />
• Provide investigation into optimum working fluid<br />
• Produce the conceptual design and comparison of<br />
multiple methods of heat exchange<br />
• Analyze the system performance based on the<br />
designed heat exchanger<br />
Time (s)<br />
When the most effective heat<br />
exchanger had been determined, a<br />
simulation was created to analyze the<br />
effect of the inlet velocity of the shell<br />
side fluid on the pressure drop across<br />
the component. A full scale model was<br />
created within the ANSYS environment<br />
and used to display pressure contours<br />
over the longitudinal axis.<br />
Log Mean Temperature Calculation<br />
Post simulation, a calculation was undertaken in<br />
order to determine the length of pipe required to<br />
achieve the desired outlet temperature of the heat<br />
exchanger. It was found that using the velocity<br />
previously determined, a minimum length of pipe<br />
required was 2.49m which exceeded the<br />
dimensional restrictions set by the on road<br />
applicability of the system.<br />
System Analysis<br />
After concluding that the outlet temperature<br />
required couldn’t be achieved within the design<br />
specification, alternate suggestions were evaluated.<br />
The graph on the right shows a reheat cycle with a<br />
system efficiency of 55.7% and thermal efficiency<br />
of 46.8%. The downside to this suggestion is that<br />
additional heat exchangers will be required to<br />
achieve the reheat and superheat sections of the<br />
cycle.<br />
Simulation<br />
Using the results of the simulation, an inlet velocity of 0.3<br />
m/s was selected, the pressure drop measured for this<br />
velocity was considered relatively negligible, and therefore<br />
a suggestion for further investigation into the effect of<br />
baffles on the increase of heat transfer has been made.<br />
2<br />
1<br />
3<br />
3i<br />
4<br />
Project Conclusion<br />
The double pipe design concept was proven to be<br />
the most effective design considering the thermal<br />
and dimensional restrictions imposed.<br />
Preliminary investigation has proven that water is<br />
the most effective working fluid, due to its inherent<br />
ability to increase the mechanical and thermal<br />
efficiency of the desired cycle. In addition to this the<br />
availability and low environmental impact of this<br />
working fluid further give validation to the selection.<br />
Moreover, experimentation has proven that the<br />
temperature achieved within the exhaust is sufficient<br />
to provide a viable heat source for application of a<br />
Rankine thermodynamic cycle. However considering<br />
the design restrictions imposed on the exhaust by the<br />
on road applicability of the system, the required<br />
temperature for a feasible Rankine cycle cannot be<br />
achieved with a single heat exchanger.<br />
Finally, to mitigate this problem alternate<br />
suggestions have been provided to provide useful<br />
means for the recovery of energy within the system.