UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Harry Carmichael<br />
Meng Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Project Supervisor<br />
Dr Aruna Palipana<br />
Design and Viability Analysis of a Diffuser Augmented Hydrokinetic Power<br />
Generation System<br />
Introduction<br />
As the search for alternative renewable energy sources continues amidst<br />
dwindling fossil fuel resources, hydropower has seen a strong increase in interest<br />
and development over the last few decades. However, a subsidiary of<br />
hydropower- hydrokinetic power, has only come into the spotlight in recent years,<br />
namely to generate electricity from the tides. Unfortunately this method of<br />
power production is expensive and thus economically unfeasible for countries in<br />
the developing world. It stands to reason that similar, although on a smaller scale,<br />
hydrokinetic power systems could be applied to other fast flowing water<br />
resources such as rivers that could be economically viable in poverty stricken<br />
regions. An investigation was performed into the optimal design of a diffuser and<br />
the economical feasibility of hydrokinetic power generation system in a rural area<br />
of South Africa<br />
The aim of this thesis is to explore the development of a diffuser augmented<br />
hydrokinetic turbine to relieve electricity poverty in rural areas. This system is<br />
then compared against other power generation systems to find which option is<br />
the most viable.<br />
Finally a discussion took place on how assumptions and errors may have affected<br />
results. It was found that the CFD results have a 6% over prediction in results<br />
compared to the theoretical results.<br />
System Hydrokinetic Solar Wind Diesel<br />
Generator<br />
Capital cost (£) 42,408 28,969 65,200 22,110<br />
Operating cost<br />
(£/year)<br />
Total cost over life<br />
time (£)<br />
Cost of energy<br />
(£/kWh)<br />
Carbon dioxide<br />
emission<br />
(kg/year)<br />
1,062 1,564 1,304 Including the<br />
cost of diesel<br />
fuel: 4,897<br />
132,315 155,070 190,338 174,657<br />
0.076 0.089 0.109 0.099<br />
0 0 0 27,919<br />
Computational Fluid Dynamics<br />
Due to the complex and large number of equations involved in calculating<br />
numerical solutions of fluid flow, computational fluid dynamics software<br />
packages are used to perform the analysis in as short a time as possible. An<br />
image of the outcome of one of the simulations is shown below to the left<br />
The power coefficient, also thought of as the efficiency, was also compared<br />
between the diffuser augmented turbine and the bare turbine. As can be seen<br />
from the graph, the power coefficient is highest for the diffuser augmented<br />
turbine. This led to a power increase of 75% compared to the un-ducted<br />
turbine .<br />
Economical Viability<br />
An economical analyses was performed on the hydrokinetic turbine compared<br />
to other power generation methods. From the table shown below, the<br />
hydrokinetic power system was shown to be the best long term investment<br />
option despite having a higher capital cost than solar power.<br />
From the data collected and the results gained, it can be said with a strong<br />
amount of confidence that the diffuser caused a positive power augmentation.<br />
The percentage increase in power production is considerable, and is a much<br />
more attractive solution than deploying a turbine without a diffuser.<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
POWER COEFICIENT<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
Velocity against the Power<br />
Cp no diffuser Coefficient<br />
Cp with diffuser<br />
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4<br />
VELOCITY (M/S)<br />
Project summary<br />
An investigation has been performed to study the<br />
viability of a diffuser augmented hydrokinetic power<br />
generation system for deployment in rural or poverty<br />
stricken regions without access to electricity.<br />
A variety of computational fluid dynamic models were<br />
designed and tested to find an optimal diffuser design.<br />
This was followed by an economical viability study for<br />
the hydrokinetic power generation system compared to<br />
other power generation methods such as solar, wind<br />
and a diesel generator.<br />
The optimal diffuser design had a diffusion angle of 16<br />
degrees and a length of 0.6m. The cost per kWh for this<br />
system was £0.0701 per kWh<br />
Project Objectives<br />
• Investigate the study site for river parameters.<br />
• Develop and analyse the diffuser concept using<br />
software simulations to find an optimal diffuser<br />
design<br />
• Compare the economic feasibility of this concept<br />
compared to other power generation methods.<br />
• Examine how assumptions made during the design<br />
of the concept and analysis could have affected<br />
results.<br />
Project Conclusion<br />
It can be confidently concluded that an optimal diffuser<br />
design was found as the system produced an increase in<br />
power equal to 175% of the turbine without a diffuser<br />
installed.<br />
The economical analyses also found the hydrokinetic<br />
system to be the best long term investment. Despite<br />
not having the lowest capital investment cost.