01.06.2017 Views

UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Harry Carmichael<br />

Meng Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Project Supervisor<br />

Dr Aruna Palipana<br />

Design and Viability Analysis of a Diffuser Augmented Hydrokinetic Power<br />

Generation System<br />

Introduction<br />

As the search for alternative renewable energy sources continues amidst<br />

dwindling fossil fuel resources, hydropower has seen a strong increase in interest<br />

and development over the last few decades. However, a subsidiary of<br />

hydropower- hydrokinetic power, has only come into the spotlight in recent years,<br />

namely to generate electricity from the tides. Unfortunately this method of<br />

power production is expensive and thus economically unfeasible for countries in<br />

the developing world. It stands to reason that similar, although on a smaller scale,<br />

hydrokinetic power systems could be applied to other fast flowing water<br />

resources such as rivers that could be economically viable in poverty stricken<br />

regions. An investigation was performed into the optimal design of a diffuser and<br />

the economical feasibility of hydrokinetic power generation system in a rural area<br />

of South Africa<br />

The aim of this thesis is to explore the development of a diffuser augmented<br />

hydrokinetic turbine to relieve electricity poverty in rural areas. This system is<br />

then compared against other power generation systems to find which option is<br />

the most viable.<br />

Finally a discussion took place on how assumptions and errors may have affected<br />

results. It was found that the CFD results have a 6% over prediction in results<br />

compared to the theoretical results.<br />

System Hydrokinetic Solar Wind Diesel<br />

Generator<br />

Capital cost (£) 42,408 28,969 65,200 22,110<br />

Operating cost<br />

(£/year)<br />

Total cost over life<br />

time (£)<br />

Cost of energy<br />

(£/kWh)<br />

Carbon dioxide<br />

emission<br />

(kg/year)<br />

1,062 1,564 1,304 Including the<br />

cost of diesel<br />

fuel: 4,897<br />

132,315 155,070 190,338 174,657<br />

0.076 0.089 0.109 0.099<br />

0 0 0 27,919<br />

Computational Fluid Dynamics<br />

Due to the complex and large number of equations involved in calculating<br />

numerical solutions of fluid flow, computational fluid dynamics software<br />

packages are used to perform the analysis in as short a time as possible. An<br />

image of the outcome of one of the simulations is shown below to the left<br />

The power coefficient, also thought of as the efficiency, was also compared<br />

between the diffuser augmented turbine and the bare turbine. As can be seen<br />

from the graph, the power coefficient is highest for the diffuser augmented<br />

turbine. This led to a power increase of 75% compared to the un-ducted<br />

turbine .<br />

Economical Viability<br />

An economical analyses was performed on the hydrokinetic turbine compared<br />

to other power generation methods. From the table shown below, the<br />

hydrokinetic power system was shown to be the best long term investment<br />

option despite having a higher capital cost than solar power.<br />

From the data collected and the results gained, it can be said with a strong<br />

amount of confidence that the diffuser caused a positive power augmentation.<br />

The percentage increase in power production is considerable, and is a much<br />

more attractive solution than deploying a turbine without a diffuser.<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

POWER COEFICIENT<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Velocity against the Power<br />

Cp no diffuser Coefficient<br />

Cp with diffuser<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4<br />

VELOCITY (M/S)<br />

Project summary<br />

An investigation has been performed to study the<br />

viability of a diffuser augmented hydrokinetic power<br />

generation system for deployment in rural or poverty<br />

stricken regions without access to electricity.<br />

A variety of computational fluid dynamic models were<br />

designed and tested to find an optimal diffuser design.<br />

This was followed by an economical viability study for<br />

the hydrokinetic power generation system compared to<br />

other power generation methods such as solar, wind<br />

and a diesel generator.<br />

The optimal diffuser design had a diffusion angle of 16<br />

degrees and a length of 0.6m. The cost per kWh for this<br />

system was £0.0701 per kWh<br />

Project Objectives<br />

• Investigate the study site for river parameters.<br />

• Develop and analyse the diffuser concept using<br />

software simulations to find an optimal diffuser<br />

design<br />

• Compare the economic feasibility of this concept<br />

compared to other power generation methods.<br />

• Examine how assumptions made during the design<br />

of the concept and analysis could have affected<br />

results.<br />

Project Conclusion<br />

It can be confidently concluded that an optimal diffuser<br />

design was found as the system produced an increase in<br />

power equal to 175% of the turbine without a diffuser<br />

installed.<br />

The economical analyses also found the hydrokinetic<br />

system to be the best long term investment. Despite<br />

not having the lowest capital investment cost.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!