01.06.2017 Views

UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Joseph Driscoll<br />

BEng Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Project Supervisor<br />

Dr. Benjamin Drew<br />

Steering Control For Tilting Vehicles<br />

Justification For Tilting Vehicles<br />

In order for a conventional car to roll over, the<br />

moment applied about the outer wheel by the<br />

inertial forces must be higher than the moment<br />

caused by weight acting at the centre of the<br />

vehicle. Conventional vehicles generally have a<br />

track width that will cause the vehicle to lose grip<br />

and slide, before roll over is possible. Described<br />

by: tt<br />

2h > 1 Non-tilting vehicle free body diagram<br />

Model Development<br />

The simulation model was produced in Simulink.<br />

The model was based on equations of motion<br />

derived from the combination of a “bicycle model”<br />

for the lateral characteristics of the vehicle, and an<br />

inverted pendulum model to represent the tilting<br />

degree of freedom of the model. The transfer<br />

function from steering angle to tilt angle was then<br />

found as:<br />

φφ<br />

(ss) = − mm tth UUUUUU+UU 2<br />

ββ ff ll<br />

II 1 +mm tt h 2 ss 2 −mm tt ggh<br />

Simulations<br />

A number of simulations were carried out, with<br />

the primary objective of testing the control system<br />

model under conditions that may occur in every<br />

day driving situations. The simulation scenarios<br />

included roundabouts at various speeds, a<br />

motorway lane change, and the ISO 3888-2<br />

obstacle avoidance test.<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Desired<br />

Actual<br />

Project summary<br />

Due to several factors such as rising congestion and<br />

fuel prices, the need has arisen for a vehicle that<br />

combines the fuel efficiency, manoeuvrability and<br />

space saving attributes of a motorcycle, with the<br />

safety and driveability of a conventional car; this<br />

need has made way for a class of narrow track tilting<br />

vehicles. An investigation was carried out into the<br />

viability of steering tilt control (STC) in narrow track<br />

tilting vehicles for road use.<br />

10<br />

When the centre of mass is tilted into a curve, risk<br />

of rolling over is reduced. If the vehicle is able to<br />

tilt by angle φφ, and moments are taken about the<br />

tilt axis (assuming system is in equilibrium and<br />

assuming that the tilt axis is located at<br />

approximately ground level), the relationship can<br />

be found: UU = RRRR tttttttt. This relationship shows<br />

that with a tilting degree of freedom, the<br />

maximum allowable forward velocity for the<br />

vehicle to remain in equilibrium is limited only by<br />

the maximum achievable tilt angle of the vehicle.<br />

Subsystems were added to the model in order to<br />

plot global displacement of the vehicle model.<br />

Global displacement conversion subsystem<br />

A subsystem was also added to more adequately<br />

simulate a realistic driver steering input, consisting<br />

of a series of rate limiters to smooth the steering<br />

input.<br />

Steering angle smoothing subsystem<br />

The final Simulink model was then produced,<br />

ready to carry out various simulation scenarios to<br />

test the viability of the control system.<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

-40<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

Roundabout third exit simulation<br />

Roundabout tests highlighted issues with the<br />

Simulink model .<br />

Motorway lane change simulation<br />

The control system performed well in the high<br />

speed, low steering angle manoeuvres<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

Desired<br />

Actual<br />

-1<br />

20 40 60 80 100 120 140<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

Desired<br />

Actual<br />

Boundary<br />

Boundary<br />

Project Objectives<br />

The main objective of the investigation was to<br />

determine the viability of STC in tilting road vehicles.<br />

In order to achieve the main objective it was<br />

necessary to develop a vehicle model and control<br />

system using Matlab and Simulink that would<br />

mathematically simulate the behaviour of a vehicle<br />

utilising STC.<br />

Project Conclusion<br />

It was concluded that although the theoretical vehicle<br />

in the STC model was able to negotiate all of the test<br />

manoeuvres successfully, the path deviation caused<br />

by the required counter steer of the steering system<br />

could be dangerous under real world conditions.<br />

Therefore it is proposed that further research be<br />

conducted into a system where STC would be assisted<br />

by direct tilt control (DTC) in order to reduce path<br />

deviations.<br />

0<br />

-0.5<br />

-1<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

Tilting Vehicle free body diagram<br />

Final Simulink model<br />

ISO 3888-2 simulation<br />

In emergency obstacle avoidance manoeuvres the<br />

control system would produce a significant course<br />

deviation at changes in vehicle heading.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!