UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Joseph Driscoll<br />
BEng Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />
Project Supervisor<br />
Dr. Benjamin Drew<br />
Steering Control For Tilting Vehicles<br />
Justification For Tilting Vehicles<br />
In order for a conventional car to roll over, the<br />
moment applied about the outer wheel by the<br />
inertial forces must be higher than the moment<br />
caused by weight acting at the centre of the<br />
vehicle. Conventional vehicles generally have a<br />
track width that will cause the vehicle to lose grip<br />
and slide, before roll over is possible. Described<br />
by: tt<br />
2h > 1 Non-tilting vehicle free body diagram<br />
Model Development<br />
The simulation model was produced in Simulink.<br />
The model was based on equations of motion<br />
derived from the combination of a “bicycle model”<br />
for the lateral characteristics of the vehicle, and an<br />
inverted pendulum model to represent the tilting<br />
degree of freedom of the model. The transfer<br />
function from steering angle to tilt angle was then<br />
found as:<br />
φφ<br />
(ss) = − mm tth UUUUUU+UU 2<br />
ββ ff ll<br />
II 1 +mm tt h 2 ss 2 −mm tt ggh<br />
Simulations<br />
A number of simulations were carried out, with<br />
the primary objective of testing the control system<br />
model under conditions that may occur in every<br />
day driving situations. The simulation scenarios<br />
included roundabouts at various speeds, a<br />
motorway lane change, and the ISO 3888-2<br />
obstacle avoidance test.<br />
30<br />
20<br />
Desired<br />
Actual<br />
Project summary<br />
Due to several factors such as rising congestion and<br />
fuel prices, the need has arisen for a vehicle that<br />
combines the fuel efficiency, manoeuvrability and<br />
space saving attributes of a motorcycle, with the<br />
safety and driveability of a conventional car; this<br />
need has made way for a class of narrow track tilting<br />
vehicles. An investigation was carried out into the<br />
viability of steering tilt control (STC) in narrow track<br />
tilting vehicles for road use.<br />
10<br />
When the centre of mass is tilted into a curve, risk<br />
of rolling over is reduced. If the vehicle is able to<br />
tilt by angle φφ, and moments are taken about the<br />
tilt axis (assuming system is in equilibrium and<br />
assuming that the tilt axis is located at<br />
approximately ground level), the relationship can<br />
be found: UU = RRRR tttttttt. This relationship shows<br />
that with a tilting degree of freedom, the<br />
maximum allowable forward velocity for the<br />
vehicle to remain in equilibrium is limited only by<br />
the maximum achievable tilt angle of the vehicle.<br />
Subsystems were added to the model in order to<br />
plot global displacement of the vehicle model.<br />
Global displacement conversion subsystem<br />
A subsystem was also added to more adequately<br />
simulate a realistic driver steering input, consisting<br />
of a series of rate limiters to smooth the steering<br />
input.<br />
Steering angle smoothing subsystem<br />
The final Simulink model was then produced,<br />
ready to carry out various simulation scenarios to<br />
test the viability of the control system.<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
Displacement (m)<br />
Roundabout third exit simulation<br />
Roundabout tests highlighted issues with the<br />
Simulink model .<br />
Motorway lane change simulation<br />
The control system performed well in the high<br />
speed, low steering angle manoeuvres<br />
Displacement (m)<br />
Displacement (m)<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Displacement (m)<br />
Desired<br />
Actual<br />
-1<br />
20 40 60 80 100 120 140<br />
Displacement (m)<br />
Desired<br />
Actual<br />
Boundary<br />
Boundary<br />
Project Objectives<br />
The main objective of the investigation was to<br />
determine the viability of STC in tilting road vehicles.<br />
In order to achieve the main objective it was<br />
necessary to develop a vehicle model and control<br />
system using Matlab and Simulink that would<br />
mathematically simulate the behaviour of a vehicle<br />
utilising STC.<br />
Project Conclusion<br />
It was concluded that although the theoretical vehicle<br />
in the STC model was able to negotiate all of the test<br />
manoeuvres successfully, the path deviation caused<br />
by the required counter steer of the steering system<br />
could be dangerous under real world conditions.<br />
Therefore it is proposed that further research be<br />
conducted into a system where STC would be assisted<br />
by direct tilt control (DTC) in order to reduce path<br />
deviations.<br />
0<br />
-0.5<br />
-1<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Displacement (m)<br />
Tilting Vehicle free body diagram<br />
Final Simulink model<br />
ISO 3888-2 simulation<br />
In emergency obstacle avoidance manoeuvres the<br />
control system would produce a significant course<br />
deviation at changes in vehicle heading.