01.06.2017 Views

UWE Bristol Engineering showcase 2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mohd Raffy Fatlly<br />

BEng (Hons) Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Project Supervisor<br />

Dr Abdessalem Bouferrouk<br />

A generic overview of aircraft drag reduction<br />

Introduction<br />

Besides having a direct impact on aircraft performance,<br />

drag reduction has a spectrum of positive effects<br />

particularly on the economic viability and environment<br />

sustainability. To illustrate, it has been reported that<br />

fuel consumption contributes approximately 22% of<br />

the Direct Operating Cost (Rennaux, 2004). This means<br />

that even with minor reduction in drag, greatly from<br />

minor reduction in drag, large operational ranges could<br />

be achieved.<br />

Apart from having positive impact on economy, drag<br />

reduction also means low emission of carbon dioxide.<br />

Thus, it is important to realise that the survivability of<br />

future civil aviation would be greatly dependant on the<br />

effort done to sustain the environment in the present.<br />

Theory<br />

Types of drag and its drag contributions<br />

Comparisons of Wing-Tip Devices and Wing-Tip Extensions<br />

Based on the data obtained from a study conducted by Whitcomb (1977), the results<br />

indicate that winglets have better performance as compared to tip extensions. However,<br />

it was only the case with short tip extensions. Quoted from the experimental work done<br />

in 1983, 12% increase in aspect ratio is required in order to decrease the drag by 5%.<br />

Henceforth, this indicates that for the same amount of drag reduction, winglets would<br />

be the best option as winglets would have a smaller and lighter chord than the wing tip.<br />

Project summary<br />

A considerable amount of studies have been carried<br />

out over the past decades concerning the reduction<br />

of aerodynamic drag on civil aircraft<br />

In the context of subsonic flow under cruise<br />

conditions, skin friction account approximately a half<br />

of the total drag while vortex drag contributes about<br />

one third of the total drag<br />

The paper will present a generic overview on the<br />

various concepts of parasitic drag and lift-induced<br />

drag on civil aircraft. A brief summary of each method<br />

will be given and their pros and cons will be discussed<br />

from fluid mechanics points of view.<br />

Project Objectives<br />

The primary objective for this paper to provide a<br />

generic overview on the approaches that have been<br />

proposed to reduce aerodynamic drag particularly on<br />

parasitic drag and lift-induced drag. Furthermore, this<br />

study aims to present the historical background of<br />

each method. Different challenges of each method<br />

will be analysed and comparison of their<br />

performance will be evaluated.<br />

Project Conclusion<br />

It is apparent that two methods have shown great<br />

results in reducing skin friction drag; Hybrid laminar<br />

flow control (HLFC) and riblets have produces a<br />

satisfying level or drag reduction in certain<br />

applications. The use of riblets reduce 2% of drag<br />

while HLFC reduce drag approximately 10%<br />

It can be concluded that Hybrid laminar flow control<br />

is the most promising technique in reducing skin<br />

friction drag. On the other hand, the best approach<br />

to reduce lift-induced drag is by employing wing-tip<br />

devices with (2%) drag reduction. From previous<br />

comparisons, it has been determine that winglets<br />

would be the best option as compared to other<br />

devices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!