15.12.2012 Views

Medical Hydrology and Balneology: Environmental Aspects

Medical Hydrology and Balneology: Environmental Aspects

Medical Hydrology and Balneology: Environmental Aspects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Methodological comments on balneotherapy<br />

actual medical benefit assessment<br />

Roques CF (1)<br />

(1) AFRETH Scientific Committee President. Paris. France<br />

cf.roques@gmail.com<br />

Introduction <strong>and</strong> Objectives<br />

Balneotherapy is a complex, non-pharmacological intervention, whose actual<br />

medical benefit has to be established by the Evidence Based Medicine’s processes.<br />

EBM needs conclusive clinical trials: well designed clinical trials statistically<br />

significant for the main endpoint.<br />

Materials <strong>and</strong> Methods<br />

A “clinical trial” must have a clinical main endpoint (= directly perceptible by<br />

the patient). The number of patients to enroll (usually a difficult issue) has to be<br />

previously calculated according to the main endpoint modification score. An Intention<br />

To Treat statistical analysis will be performed using appropriate statistical tests.<br />

The criteria of importance are crucial to establish the relevance of the main endpoint<br />

modifications. Criteria of importance as Minimum Clinically Important Improvement,<br />

Minimum Detectable Change, Responder (or non responder) scores,<br />

Patient Acceptable State, critical values etc. have to be used whenever existing.<br />

Results<br />

R<strong>and</strong>omisation, well appropriated for drugs assessment, can be a controversial<br />

issue for complex interventions assessment. Peculiar r<strong>and</strong>omisation designs can be<br />

useful (Zelen, cluster r<strong>and</strong>omisation, …), preference trials but also alternative<br />

designs to r<strong>and</strong>omization have to be discussed such as observational studies of<br />

cohorts matched using propensity scores. Blind assessment of the patients is also an<br />

important issue. The duration of the follow-up must be appropriate to the condition<br />

treated but also acceptable for the patient. The different interventions (treatment<br />

tested <strong>and</strong> control treatment) have to be defined <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardised. The patients’<br />

follow-up needs to give information about lost patients, changes of study arm,<br />

patients’ withdrawals, … . The adverse events have to be reported <strong>and</strong> described in<br />

the paper. Whenever possible <strong>and</strong> necessary, the trial would be a multicentre one,<br />

testing the different waters used for the investigated condition. A preliminary feasibility<br />

study can be useful to approach the effect size of the treatment ; its usefulness<br />

to predict capacity to enroll the patients is more controversial.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The conformity to ethical national regulations has to be validated by an ethic<br />

committee; the trial will be registered before the beginning of the patients’ inclu-<br />

Balnea<br />

2012, núm. 6, 81-82<br />

81<br />

ISBN: 978-84-669-1887-0<br />

978-84-669-3482-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!