19.12.2012 Views

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography - Get a Free Blog

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography - Get a Free Blog

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"international cooperation" on green issues. "We will support you," intoned Gilbert<br />

Grosvenor, a fellow Yale alumnus "...Planet Earth is at risk." Among those present during<br />

that gala evening was Sir Edmund Hillary, who had planted the Union Jack at the summit<br />

of Mount Everest. [fn 8]<br />

In order to be the Environmental President, <strong>Bush</strong> was willing to propose a disastrous<br />

Clean Air Act that would drain the economy of hundreds of billions of dollars over time<br />

in the name of fighting acid rain. <strong>Bush</strong>'s first hundred days coincided with the notable<br />

phenomenon of the "greening" of Margaret Thatcher, who had previously denounced<br />

environmentalists as "the enemy within," and fellow travellers of the British Labour Party<br />

and the loonie left. Thatcher's resident ideologue, Nicholas Ridley, had referred to the<br />

green movement in Britian as "pseudo-Marxists." But in the early months of 1989,<br />

allegedly under the guidance of Sir Crispin Tickell, the British Ambassador to the United<br />

Nations, Thatcher embraced the orthodoxy that the erosion of the ozone layer, the<br />

greenhouse effect, and acid rain --every one of them a pseudo-scientific hoax--were<br />

indeed at the top of the list of the urgent problems of the human species. Thatcher's<br />

acceptance of the green orthodoxy permitted the swift establishment of a total<br />

environmentalist-Malthusian consensus in the European Community, the Group of 7, and<br />

other key international forums.<br />

Characteristically, <strong>Bush</strong> followed Thatcher's lead, as he would on so many other issues.<br />

During the hundred days, <strong>Bush</strong> called for the elimination of all chlorofluorocarbons<br />

(CFCs) by the end of the century, thus accepting the position assumed by the European<br />

Community as a result of Mrs. Thatcher's turning green. <strong>Bush</strong> told the National Academy<br />

of Sciences that new "scientific advancements" had permitted the identification of a<br />

serious threat to the ozone layer; <strong>Bush</strong> stressed the need to "reduce CFCs that deplete our<br />

precious upper atmospheric resources." A treaty had been signed in Montreal in 1987 that<br />

called for cutting the production of CFCs by one half within a ten-year period. "But<br />

recent studies indicate that this 50 percent reduction may not be enough," <strong>Bush</strong> now<br />

opined. Senator Al Gore of Tennessee was calling for complete elimination of CFCs<br />

within five years. Here a pattern emerged that was to be repeated frequently during the<br />

<strong>Bush</strong> years: <strong>Bush</strong> would make sweeping concessions to the environmentalist Luddites,<br />

but would then be denounced by them for measures that were insufficiently radical. This<br />

would be the case when <strong>Bush</strong>'s Clean Air Bill was going through the Congress during the<br />

summer of 1990.<br />

After <strong>Bush</strong>'s appearance before the Congress with his revised budget, the new regime<br />

exploited the honeymoon to seal a sweetheart contract with the rubber-stamp<br />

Congressional Democrats, who under no circumstances could be confused with an<br />

opposition. <strong>The</strong> de facto one party state was alive and well, personified by milquetoast<br />

Senator <strong>George</strong> Mitchell of Maine, the Democrats' Majority Leader. <strong>The</strong> collusion<br />

between <strong>Bush</strong> and the Democratic leadership involved new sleight of hand in order to<br />

meet the defecit targets stipulated by the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings law. This involved<br />

mobilizing more than $100 billion from surpluses in the Social Security, highway, and<br />

other special trust funds which had not previously been counted. <strong>The</strong> Democrats also<br />

went along with a $28 billion package of asset sales, financing tricks, and unspecified

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!