George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography - Get a Free Blog

Yes, absolutely consistent. I want to see him [Noriega] out of there and I want to see him brought
to justice. And that should not imply that that automatically means, no matter what the plan is, or
no matter what the coup attempt is, diplomatically and anything else, that we give carte blanche
support to that.
I think this rather sophisticated argument that if you say you'd like to see Noriega out, that implies
a blanket, open carte blanche on the use of American military force...to me that's a stupid
argument that some very erudite people make.
Bush was very sarcastic about "instant hawks appearing from where there used to be
feathers of a dove." There had been reports of severe temper tantrums by Bush as critical
accounts of his crisis leadership had been leaked from inside his own administration. But
Bush denied that he had been chewing the carpet: "I never felt, you know, anger or
blowing up. It's absurd," Bush stated disingenuously. "I didn't get angry. I didn't get
angry. What I did say is, I don't want to see any blame coming out of the Oval Office or
attributed to the Oval Office in the face of criticism. I'm not in the blame business.
Blame, if there's some to be assigned, it comes in there. And that's where it belongs."
Bush stressed that he was ready to use force to oust Noriega: "I wouldn't mind using
force now if it could be done in a prudent manner. We want to see Mr. Noriega out." The
mortified former CIA director also defended the quality of his intelligence: "There has
not been an intelligence gap that would make me act in a different way." "I don't see any
serious disconnects at all." [fn 22] Bush's chief of staff, Sununu, had stated that one of the
difficulties faced by the White House in reacting to the coup had been the difficulty of
determining the identity of the coup leaders. While that was probably disinformation,
Bush's disarray was most poignant. It was while squirming and whining under of the
opprobrium of his first failure in Panama that Bush matured the idea of a large-scale
military invasion to capture Noriega and occupy Panama around Christmas, 1989.
George Bush's involvement with Panama goes back to operations conducted in Central
American and the Caribbean conducted by Senator Prescott Bush's Jupiter Island
Harrimanite cabal. We recall Bush's pugnacious assertions of US sovereignty over the
Panama Canal during his 1964 electoral contest with Senator Yarborough. For the Bush
clan, the cathexis of Panama is very deep, since it is bound up with the exploits of
Theodore Roosevelt, the founder of the twentieth-century US imperialism which the
Bush family is determined to defend to the farthest corners of the planet. For it was
Theodore Roosevelt who had used the USS Nashville and other US naval forces to
prevent the Colombian military from repressing the US-fomented revolt of Panamanian
soldiers in November, 1903, thus setting the stage for the creation of an independent
Panama and for the signing of the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty which created a Panama
Canal Zone under US control. Roosevelt's "cowboy diplomacy" had been excoriated in
the US press of those days as "piracy;" the Springfield Republican had found the episode
"the most discreditable in our history," but the Bush view was always pro-imperialist. It
was the comparison with Theodore Roosevelt's bucaneering audacity that made poor
George look bad.
Theodore Roosevelt had in December, 1904 expounded his so-called "Roosevelt
Corrollary" to the Monroe Doctrine, in reality a complete repudiation and perversion of