19.12.2012 Views

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography - Get a Free Blog

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography - Get a Free Blog

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

affair once again. Washington rumor had it that <strong>Bush</strong>'s first choice for the post had been<br />

Don Gregg, and that <strong>Bush</strong>'s handlers had exahusted their energies in persuading <strong>Bush</strong> to<br />

renounce this even bigger provocation. When <strong>Bush</strong> had been forced to drop Gregg, he<br />

had insisted on Gates. Obsessions and hyperthyroidism had been at work in all this. Now<br />

<strong>Bush</strong> was asked about Gates: was his story credible that he knew nothing of illegal funds<br />

transfer when those above and below him in the chain of command knew all about it?<br />

<strong>Bush</strong>'s first comment was moderate in tone:<br />

Doesn't stretch my credibility because I believe firmly in Bob Gates's word. And he's a<br />

man of total honor, and he should be confirmed as Director of Central Intelligence. And<br />

when you have behind-doors, closed-door allegations that nobody really knows anything<br />

about, I'm not sure where the fairness element comes in on that one, Jim.<br />

<strong>The</strong> next day, July 12, <strong>Bush</strong> engaged in a question and answer session with reporters.<br />

<strong>Bush</strong> was dressed in sporting togs, but today he was out of control. His first impulse was<br />

to escape from the reporters:<br />

Hey, listen. I've got to go now. Heavy recreation coming up before we go abroad, so I've<br />

got to keep going.<br />

He fought off some questions about Clarence Thomas allegedly smoking marijuana,<br />

commenting that this was not disqualifying. <strong>The</strong>n, there was a mention of Gates:<br />

Q: Has Gates told you about-<br />

That touched <strong>Bush</strong>'s obsession of the day. Gates had been accused of complicity in Irancontra<br />

gun-running and drug running; but <strong>Bush</strong> himself had once again come under<br />

attack for his role in the October surprise conspiracy to delay the release of US hostages<br />

held in Teheran. Several days before, the former director of Central American affairs for<br />

the CIA, Alan Fiers, had admitted lying to Congress. Special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh<br />

was continuing his investigation, and it was now clear that the Senate would not vote on<br />

the Gates nomination until the autumn. At this point <strong>Bush</strong> broke in, and with a contorted<br />

face launched into an interminable enraged monologue, angrily brushing aside<br />

interruptions. <strong>The</strong> passages are worth reproducing here in detail because of the insight<br />

they afford into the workings of a tormented mind:<br />

<strong>Bush</strong>: Let me say something on the Gates matter. What are we coming to here? You're<br />

talking to somebody who had to prove his innocence --me--on the basis of rumor. It was<br />

alleged by people that we weren't sure who they were, that I was in Paris at some deal to<br />

keep Americans in captivity. That's what the allegation was against me. And I'm saying<br />

to myself, who's making these allegations? What's the evidence? What have we come to<br />

where a man has to prove his innocence against some fluid, movable charge?<br />

And now I'm thinking about Bob Gates. And I'm saying: What is this all about? Isn't the<br />

people that might be accusing him of something --shouldn't it be their responsibility<br />

under the American system of fairplay? I have full confidence in him. But what is this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!