25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 119<br />

Dermal Effects<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

Inorganic Mercury. Limited in<strong>for</strong>mation was located regarding dermal effects of inorganic mercury in<br />

humans. Several children who were treated with medications containing mercurous chloride <strong>for</strong><br />

constipation, worms, or teething discom<strong>for</strong>t exhibited flushing of the palms of the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> soles of the feet<br />

(Warkany <strong>and</strong> Hubbard 1953). The flushing was frequently accompanied by itching, swelling, <strong>and</strong><br />

desquamation of these areas. Morbilli<strong>for</strong>m rashes, conjunctivitis, <strong>and</strong> excessive perspiration were also<br />

frequently observed in the affected children. Patch tests conducted in several children revealed that the<br />

rashes were not allergic reactions to the mercury. Kang-Yum <strong>and</strong> Oransky (1992) reported hives in a woman<br />

who ingested a Chinese medicine containing an unspecified amount of mercurous chloride, which suggests<br />

an allergic response to the medicine.<br />

No studies were located regarding dermal effects in animals after oral exposure to inorganic mercury.<br />

Organic Mercury. Only a few studies were identified regarding dermal effects of organic mercury,<br />

however, the case history concerning dimethylmercury exposure is a very important alert to the hazards of<br />

this organomercurial.<br />

Blayney et al. (1997) originally reported the fatal case of a dimethylmercury exposure after a dermal<br />

exposure to an extremely small amount of material. The case history was subsequently detailed by<br />

Nierenberg et al. (1998). The exposure occurred to a 48-year-old female chemistry professor who was<br />

admitted to the hospital 5 months (154 days) after, as best as can be determined, she inadvertently spilled<br />

several drops (estimated at 0.4–0.5 mL; about 1,500 mg) of dimethylmercury from the tip of her pipette<br />

onto the back of her disposable latex gloves. The spill was cleaned <strong>and</strong> the gloves disposed of. Hair<br />

analysis on a long str<strong>and</strong> of hair revealed that after a brief lag time, mercury content rose rapidly to almost<br />

1,100 ppm (normal level, 50 ppm), <strong>and</strong> then slowly declined with a half-life of<br />

74.6 days. These results support the occurrence of one or several episodes of exposure, <strong>and</strong> are consistent<br />

with laboratory notebook accounts of a single accidental exposure. Testing of family members, laboratory<br />

coworkers, <strong>and</strong> laboratory surfaces failed to reveal any unsuspected mercury spills or other cases of toxic<br />

blood or urinary mercury levels. Permeation tests subsequently per<strong>for</strong>med on disposable latex gloves<br />

similar to those the patient had worn at the time of the lone exposure revealed that dimethylmercury<br />

penetrates such gloves rapidly <strong>and</strong> completely, with penetration occurring in 15 seconds or less <strong>and</strong> perhaps<br />

instantly. Polyvinyl chloride gloves were equally permeable to dimethylmercury. Five days prior to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!