25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 293<br />

More on Health Effects <strong>and</strong> Dental Amalgam.<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

A number of government sponsored scientific reviews of the literature on the health effects associated with<br />

the use of dental amalgam have concluded that the data do not demonstrate a health hazard <strong>for</strong> the large<br />

majority of individuals exposed to mercury vapor at levels commonly encountered from dental amalgam<br />

(DHHS 1993; Health Canada 1997). Governments that have restricted the use of amalgam or recommend<br />

limited use (e.g., Germany, Sweden, Denmark, <strong>and</strong> Canada) cite the need to minimize human exposure to all<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms of mercury as much as possible <strong>and</strong> to reduce the release of mercury to the environment (DHHS 1993;<br />

Health Canada 1997). The restrictive actions, however are prospective, <strong>and</strong> none of the government reports<br />

recommend removing existing fillings in people who have no indication of adverse effects attributable to<br />

mercury exposure. Removal of existing amalgams, if improperly per<strong>for</strong>med or not indicated, may result in<br />

unnecessarily high exposure to mercury. Levels of mercury release <strong>for</strong> various dental procedures have been<br />

reported by Eley (1997). Chelation therapy (used to remove metals from the body tissues) also may have<br />

adverse health effects (<strong>and</strong> varying levels of effectiveness), <strong>and</strong> should be considered only in consultation<br />

with a qualified physician.<br />

In 1990 in the United States, over 200 million restorative procedures were provided of which dental<br />

amalgam accounted <strong>for</strong> roughly 96 million (DHHS 1993). In the 1970s, the use of amalgam was 38%<br />

higher. The use of mercury amalgam has been steadily declining <strong>and</strong> is expected to continue to decline due<br />

to improvements in dental hygiene <strong>and</strong> preventive care. Approximately 70% of the restorations placed<br />

annually are replacements. Advocates of the safety of amalgam emphasize the long history of use (over<br />

150 years) <strong>and</strong> the large exposed population without apparent adverse effects as strong support <strong>for</strong> their<br />

position (ADA 1997). They also underscore the poor quality of the studies in the literature reporting adverse<br />

effects attributable to amalgam. Researchers concerned about the safety of mercury amalgams counter that<br />

sample sizes in the studies that support the safety of amalgams are also too small to detect low frequency<br />

effects in the general population, <strong>and</strong> that the absence of high quality studies simply reflects the relatively<br />

small amount of research ef<strong>for</strong>t that has gone into resolving this very important issue (Richardson 1995;<br />

Weiner et al. 1990).<br />

The general public is also clearly concerned about the placement of mercury, a substance with demonstrated<br />

toxic effects, into their mouths. A survey conducted by the American Dental Association in 1991<br />

demonstrated that nearly half of the 1,000 American adults surveyed believed that health problems could<br />

develop as a result of dental amalgam (ADA 1991). Increases in life expectancy <strong>and</strong> increases in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!