25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 143<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

>12 ppm (n=99). No significant or remarkable effect on the activity of the respective groups of children<br />

was observed outside the highest concentration group (i.e., maternal hair concentrations >12 ppm). When<br />

boys were examined separately, there appeared to be a trend toward decreased activity with increasing<br />

mercury concentrations, most visible above the group median value of 5.9 ppm. The mercury effect was<br />

highly significant in males (p=0.0004), but it was not statistically significant (p=0.87) in females. The<br />

activity level scores <strong>for</strong> males decreases 1/10 point (on a 9-point scale) <strong>for</strong> every ppm of mercury in<br />

maternal hair. While the activity score <strong>for</strong> the overall cohort was comparable to the mode of 5 <strong>for</strong> U.S.<br />

children, those children born to mothers with hair mercury levels of 20 ppm, males scored >1 point below<br />

the U.S. mode value. Scores of females remained at the comparable value <strong>for</strong> U.S. children, regardless of<br />

the magnitude of maternal hair mercury level. When the subjective activity scores <strong>for</strong> male <strong>and</strong> female<br />

children are evaluated collectively, no significant/remarkable decrease in activity is apparent outside the<br />

>12 ppm maternal hair concentration group. The affect on activity level in boys is not considered an<br />

adverse effect, <strong>and</strong> the 5.9 ppm level is categorized as a NOAEL. Since the children had been exposed in<br />

utero, they represent the most sensitive subpopulation.<br />

Myers et al. (1997) evaluated the population of the SCDS <strong>for</strong> developmental milestones similar to those<br />

determined in Iraq. As part of this ongoing study, cohort children were evaluated at 6.5, 19, 29, <strong>and</strong><br />

66 months of age. At 19 months care-givers were asked at what age the child walked (n=720 out of 738)<br />

<strong>and</strong> talked (n=680). Prenatal mercury exposure was determined by atomic absorption analysis of maternal<br />

hair segments corresponding to hair growth during the pregnancy.<br />

The median mercury level in maternal hair <strong>for</strong> the cohort in this analysis was 5.8 ppm with a range of<br />

0.5–26.7 ppm. The mean age (in months) at walking was 10.7 (SD=1.9) <strong>for</strong> females <strong>and</strong> 10.6 (SD=2.0) <strong>for</strong><br />

males. The mean age <strong>for</strong> talking (in months) was 10.5 (SD=2.6) <strong>for</strong> females, <strong>and</strong> 11.0 (SD=2.9) <strong>for</strong> males.<br />

After adjusting <strong>for</strong> covariates <strong>and</strong> statistical outliers, no association was found between the age at which<br />

Seychellois children walked or talked <strong>and</strong> prenatal exposure to mercury. The ages <strong>for</strong> achievement of the<br />

developmental milestones were normal <strong>for</strong> walking <strong>and</strong> talking in the Seychellois toddlers following<br />

prenatal exposure to methylmercury from a maternal fish diet. The 5.8 ppm NOAEL of this study is thus<br />

considerably below the one derived from the dose-response analysis of the data <strong>for</strong> the Iraqi methymercury<br />

poisonings (10 ppm).<br />

The SCDS cohort continues to be monitored <strong>and</strong> evaluated <strong>for</strong> developmental effects. In an analysis of the<br />

latest round of outcome measures <strong>for</strong> children at age 66 months (n=708), Davidson et al. (1998) report no

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!