25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 214<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

Recent data from an in vitro study suggest that mercuric mercury may be more effective than methyl­<br />

mercury in some paradigms. Using patch-clamped dorsal root neurons, Arakawa et al. (1991) showed<br />

augmentation of the GABA-activated chloride current at extremely low mercuric chloride concentrations<br />

(0.1 µM), while a 1,000-fold higher concentration of methylmercury showed no such effect. The<br />

correlation between these effects observed in vitro <strong>and</strong> what may be occurring in vivo, however, is not<br />

known.<br />

The experimental data concerning the mechanism of action of methylmercury on the developing nervous<br />

system indicate that effects on the microtubules <strong>and</strong> amino acid transport are disrupted in neuronal cells<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e overt signs of intoxication are observed. Vogel et al. (1985) demonstrated the potent inhibitory<br />

effects of methylmercury on microtubule assembly at ratios stoichiometric with the tubulin dimer. The<br />

effects were thought to be mediated through MeHg binding to free sulfhydryl groups on both ends <strong>and</strong> on<br />

the surface of microtubules, which would provide multiple classes of binding sites <strong>for</strong> MeHg. In<br />

subsequent in vitro studies, Vogel et al. (1989) identified a single high affinity class of binding sites on<br />

tubulin <strong>for</strong> methylmercury with 15 sites. The authors report that MeHg binds to tubulin stoichiometrically<br />

within microtubules, <strong>and</strong> does not induce microtubule disassembly at this low binding ratio. Free subunits<br />

of tubulin, however, will act as uncompetitive inhibitors <strong>for</strong> MeHg binding to the polymer, <strong>and</strong> MeHg<br />

binding to the multiple sites in the free dimer blocks subsequent assembly. In contrast, the stoichiometric<br />

polymer surface binding sites <strong>for</strong> MeHg in microtubules apparently do not interfere with subsequent<br />

polymerization. Mitotic inhibition from damage to microtubulin <strong>and</strong> binding to tubulin has also been<br />

reported by Sager et al. (1983).<br />

Comparison of the effects of mercury on structural elements <strong>and</strong> enzyme activities (Vignani et al. 1992)<br />

suggests that effects on cytoskeletal elements may be observed at lower concentrations than on enzyme<br />

activities. In the in vivo study by Sager et al. (1982), it was concluded that methylmercury may be acting<br />

on mitotic spindle microtubules leading to cell injury in the developing cerebellar cortex. Cell injury<br />

observed in the external granular layer of the cerebellar cortex of 2-day-old rats was attributed to a reduced<br />

percentage of late mitotic figures (arrested cell division) due to the loss of spindle microtubules. Mitosis<br />

<strong>and</strong> migration of granule cells in the cerebellum end within weeks following birth; there<strong>for</strong>e, this<br />

observation may suggest potential differences in the sensitivities of children <strong>and</strong> adults to mercury-induced<br />

neurotoxicity. The toxic effects of methylmercury on the developing nervous system may also be due to<br />

deranged neuronal cell migration (Choi et al. 1978; Matsumoto et al. 1965). Examination of the brains of<br />

two infants who died following in utero exposure to methylmercury revealed an abnormal pattern in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!