25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 415<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

Granato et al. (1995) reported that municipal solid waste sludge mercury concentrations from the<br />

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago ranged from 1.1 to 8.5 mg/kg (ppm), with a<br />

mean concentration of 3.31 mg/kg (ppm). Sludge applications to a sludge utilization site in Fulton<br />

County, Illinois, from 1971 to 1995 significantly increased extractable soil mercury concentrations. In<br />

addition, 80–100% of the mercury applied to the soils in sewage sludge since 1971 still resided in the top<br />

15 cm of soil.<br />

Facemire et al. (1995) reported industrial contamination of soils <strong>and</strong> sediment in several states in the<br />

southeastern United States. The authors reported soil concentrations up to 141,000 ppm associated with<br />

contamination in northeastern Louisiana from mercury-charged manometers used to measure pressure <strong>and</strong><br />

delivery from natural gas wells. In Tennessee, a maximum mercury concentration of 1,100 ppm<br />

(associated with previous operations of the Oak Ridge nuclear facility) was found in wetl<strong>and</strong> soils<br />

adjacent to the East Fork Poplar Creek. A pharmaceutical company’s effluents enriched sediments in a<br />

localized area of Puerto Rico to 88 ppm mercury (Facemire et al. 1995). Rule <strong>and</strong> Iwashchenko (1998)<br />

reported that mean soil mercury concentrations of 1.06 ppm were collected within 2 km of a <strong>for</strong>mer chloralkali<br />

plant in Saltsville, Virginia, <strong>and</strong> that these concentrations were 17 times higher than regional<br />

background soil samples (0.063 ppm). These authors further reported that soil organic content,<br />

topographic factors, wind patterns, <strong>and</strong> elevation were variables significantly related to mercury<br />

concentration as determined by regression analysis. Soil mercury levels decreasing with distance from<br />

the <strong>for</strong>mer plant were indicative of a point source distribution pattern. A made l<strong>and</strong> soil type (Udorthent),<br />

which appears to be a by-product of the chlor-alkali manufacturing process, was found proximal to the<br />

<strong>for</strong>mer plant site <strong>and</strong> contained about 68 times (4.31 ppm) the regional background concentration.<br />

The top 15 cm of sediments in Wisconsin lakes contained higher levels of mercury (0.09–0.24 µg/g<br />

[ppm]) than sediments at lower sediment levels (0.04–0.07 µg/g [ppm]). Because the lakes are not known<br />

to receive any direct deposition of mercury, it was postulated that the primary mercury source was<br />

atmospheric deposition (Rada et al. 1989). Mercury levels in surface sediments of the St. Louis River<br />

ranged from 18 to 500 ng/L (ppt) (Glass et al. 1990). Mercury was detected in sediment samples from<br />

Crab Orchard Lake in Illinois at concentrations greater than 60 µg/L (ppb) (Kohler et al. 1990). Surficial<br />

sediment samples from several sites along the Upper Connecting Channels of the Great Lakes in 1985 had<br />

mercury concentrations ranging from below the detection limit to 55.80 µg/g (ppm) (mean concentrations<br />

ranged from 0.05 to 1.61 µg/g [ppm] at four sites) (Nichols et al. 1991). Mercury concentrations were<br />

correlated with particle size fractions <strong>and</strong> organic matter content (Mudroch <strong>and</strong> Hill 1989). Surface

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!