25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 316<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

Japanese hair mercury levels, the hair levels reported by Nakagawa (1995) of 2–4 ppm <strong>for</strong> a Japanese<br />

population are 10–20 times higher than levels observed in the Drasch et al. (1997) study (median,<br />

0.247 µg/g in hair; range, 0.43-2.5 µg/g).<br />

Other studies have confirmed a good correlation between hair mercury <strong>and</strong> brain mercury levels. In a<br />

study on the Seychelles Isl<strong>and</strong>s cohort, Cernichiari et al. (1995b) compared maternal hair levels, maternal<br />

blood levels, fetal blood levels, <strong>and</strong> fetal brain levels. Autopsy brains were obtained from infants dying<br />

from a variety of causes. The concentrations of total mercury in six major regions of the brain were highly<br />

correlated with maternal hair levels. This correlation was confirmed by a sequence of comparisons among<br />

the four measures. Maternal hair correlated to maternal blood (r=0.82) <strong>and</strong> infant brain level (r=0.6–0.8).<br />

Maternal blood correlated to infant blood (r=0.65); <strong>and</strong> infant blood correlated to infant brain (r=0.4–0.8).<br />

There are potential confounding factors <strong>and</strong> other factors to consider when assessing mercury exposure<br />

based upon mercury hair levels. Mercury may be deposited to hair from the air when significant sources<br />

of mercury are present in the air or when certain hair treatments are used (Hac <strong>and</strong> Krechniak 1993; WHO<br />

1991). Potential sources of external mercury exposure should, there<strong>for</strong>e, be evaluated as part of an<br />

exposure assessment. Some studies also report a sex related difference in mercury tissue levels. Nielson et<br />

al. (1994) observed a significant sex-related differences in the toxicokinetics of methylmercury in mice<br />

following administration of a single radiolabeled dose. Drasch et al. (1997) reported that mercury levels in<br />

all tissues assayed in their human cadaver study had higher levels compared to male tissues. The<br />

difference was significant <strong>for</strong> the kidney (median female kidney mercury level=92.0 ng/g,<br />

males=40.8 ng/g; p=0.002). In blood <strong>and</strong> urine there was a similar trend. In contrast, the authors report<br />

that mercury hair levels in females were significantly lower than in males (median females=205 ng/g,<br />

males 285 ng/g; p=0.02). Nakagawa (1995) also report higher mean mercury hair levels in males<br />

(2.98 µg/g) compared with females (2.02 µg/g) in a Japanese population. Further research is, there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

needed to characterize potential sex related difference in the toxicokinetics of mercury under different<br />

exposure scenarios.<br />

Eide <strong>and</strong> Wesenberg (1993) studied mercury concentrations in various organs <strong>and</strong> tissues in rats exposed<br />

to mercury vapor <strong>for</strong> approximately 2 months <strong>and</strong> proposed that human deciduous teeth may be useful<br />

indicators of chronic mercury exposure, as well as indicators of mercury uptake in organs such as the<br />

kidneys <strong>and</strong> the brain.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!