25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 253<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

The average values <strong>for</strong> A B <strong>for</strong> all studies ranged from 0.047 to 0.061 (the values <strong>for</strong> women <strong>and</strong> men<br />

reported in Sherlock et al. [1984]). The data suggest that the average value of A B <strong>for</strong> women may be lower<br />

than that <strong>for</strong> men, <strong>and</strong> they further suggest that 0.05 may be appropriate <strong>for</strong> modeling intake in a group of<br />

women (Sherlock et al. 1984). Based on these studies, the best estimate of A B based on the available data is<br />

0.05. Use of a higher value (i.e., 0.06 instead of 0.05) <strong>for</strong> this parameter would result in a lower MRL, but<br />

the sensitive populations are pregnant women <strong>and</strong> developing fetuses, making the 0.5 value more<br />

appropriate <strong>for</strong> the Seychelles study population.<br />

Elimination constant (b). Reported clearance half-times <strong>for</strong> methylmercury from blood or hair range from<br />

48 to 65 days (Table 2-5). The average elimination constant based on the six studies listed in Table 2-5 is<br />

0.014. The average of the individual values <strong>for</strong> b reported <strong>for</strong> 20 volunteers ingesting 42–233 µg Hg/day in<br />

fish <strong>for</strong> 3 months (Sherlock et al. 1984) is also 0.014. Use of the value 0.014 <strong>for</strong> this parameter, rather than<br />

0.01 (as used by WHO 1990), results in a higher MRL.<br />

Volume of blood in body (V), <strong>and</strong> body weight. Blood volume is assumed to be 7% of body weight, with an<br />

increase to about 9% during pregnancy (Best 1961). Data <strong>for</strong> the body weight of the Seychelles Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

women were not found. Assuming an average body weight of 60 kg <strong>for</strong> women, the blood volume is 4.2 L<br />

(60 kg x 0.07 L/kg). The 9% of body weight value is not used because it is not representative of the blood<br />

volume throughout pregnancy. Blood volume does not begin to increase significantly from the 7% prepregnancy<br />

level until around the 27th week of pregnancy. It then sharply rises until week 40 or parturition<br />

(Guyton 1996). To use the 9% value would, there<strong>for</strong>e, be representative of the blood volume late in<br />

pregnancy (i.e., mid- to late- third trimester), but not throughout most of pregnancy. In contrast, the hair<br />

mercury level to which it is compared represents an average value throughout pregnancy. The use of the 9%<br />

value would result in a higher MRL, <strong>and</strong> is not considered appropriate in this instance.<br />

Calculation of Exposure Dose<br />

The concentration of mercury in hair is assumed to be 250 times the concentration in blood. ATSDR's<br />

peer-reviewed, published guidance <strong>for</strong> MRL derivation (Chou et al. 1998) calls <strong>for</strong> the use of the highest<br />

value at which no adverse effects were observed in the critical study. Using, there<strong>for</strong>e, the 15.3 ppm mean<br />

maternal hair (taken at parturition) value from the highest exposure group (range, 12–26.7 ppm) in the<br />

Seychellois test population as a NOAEL <strong>for</strong> the 66-month Seychelles testing (Davidson et al. 1998), the<br />

corresponding methylmercury concentration in blood would be: 1/250 x 15.3 µg/g x 1 mg/1,000 µg x<br />

1,000 g/L = 0.061 mg/L.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!