25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 409<br />

5.3.2.3 Sediment <strong>and</strong> Soil<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

Mercury compounds in soils may undergo the same chemical <strong>and</strong> biological trans<strong>for</strong>mations described <strong>for</strong><br />

surface waters. Mercuric mercury usually <strong>for</strong>ms various complexes with chloride <strong>and</strong> hydroxide ions in<br />

soils; the specific complexes <strong>for</strong>med depend on the pH, salt content, <strong>and</strong> composition of the soil solution.<br />

Formation <strong>and</strong> degradation of organic mercurials in soils appear to be mediated by the same types of<br />

microbial processes occurring in surface waters <strong>and</strong> may also occur through abiotic processes (Andersson<br />

1979). Elevated levels of chloride ions reduce methylation of mercury in river sediments, sludge, <strong>and</strong> soil<br />

(Olson et al. 1991), although increased levels of organic carbon <strong>and</strong> sulfate ions increase methylation in<br />

sediments (Gilmour <strong>and</strong> Henry 1991). In freshwater <strong>and</strong> estuarine ecosystems, the presence of chloride<br />

ions (0.02 M) may accelerate the release of mercury from sediments (Wang et al. 1991).<br />

In the late 1950s, unknown quantities of mercuric nitrate <strong>and</strong> elemental mercury were released into East<br />

Fork Poplar Creek from a government facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Total mercury concentrations in<br />

the flood plain soil along the creek ranged from 0.5 to 3,000 ppm (Revis et al. 1989). An estimated<br />

170,000 pounds of that mercury remained in floodplain soil of the creek (DOE 1994). The <strong>for</strong>m of that<br />

mercury has been reported to be primarily mercuric sulfide (85–88%), with 6–9% present as elemental<br />

mercury (Revis et al. 1989, 1990). A very small amount was detected in the <strong>for</strong>m of methylmercury (less<br />

than 0.02%). The reported presence of the mercuric sulfide suggests that the predominant biological<br />

reaction in soil <strong>for</strong> mercury is the reduction of Hg +2 to mercuric sulfide by sulfate-reducing bacteria under<br />

anaerobic conditions (Revis et al. 1989, 1990). Mercuric sulfide has very limited water solubility (4.5×10-24 mol/L), <strong>and</strong> thus, in the absence of other solvents, is likely to have limited mobility in soil. Aerobic<br />

microorganisms can solubilize Hg +2 from mercuric sulfide by oxidizing the sulfide through sulfite to sulfate,<br />

with the Hg +2 being reduced to elemental mercury (Wood 1974). However, examination of the weathering<br />

of mercuric sulfide indicated that mercuric sulfide does not undergo significant weathering when bound to<br />

riverwash soil with a pH of 6.8, although degradation may be increased in the presence of chloride <strong>and</strong> iron<br />

(Harsh <strong>and</strong> Doner 1981).<br />

Mercury, frequently present in mine tailings, was toxic to bacteria isolated from a marsh treatment system<br />

used to treat municipal waste waters. The minimum concentration that inhibited the bacteria (as determined<br />

by intracellular ATP levels) was approximately 0.07±0.15 mg/L (ppm) (Desjardins et al. 1988).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!