25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 445<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

women living in interior (3.2±0.8 ppb) or urban areas (3.3±0.5 ppb) of Alaska <strong>and</strong> less than one-seventh the<br />

mean value <strong>for</strong> coastal Alaskan Inuit women (7.6±2.7 ppb) known to consume seal meat <strong>and</strong> oil, as well as<br />

marine fish (Galster 1976). The latter breast milk total mercury level is comparable to the median (2.45 ppb)<br />

<strong>and</strong> maximum (8.7 ppb) values reported <strong>for</strong> women in the Faroe Isl<strong>and</strong>s that consume large amounts of fish<br />

<strong>and</strong> pilot whale meat (Gr<strong>and</strong>jean et al. 1995a).<br />

Levels of total mercury in breast milk have been monitored in several <strong>for</strong>eign countries over the past three<br />

decades. A mean breast milk mercury concentration of 3.6±2.2 ppb (range, non-detected to 9.8 ppb) was<br />

reported <strong>for</strong> an urban population in Tokyo, Japan (Fujita <strong>and</strong> Takabatake 1977). In a study of urban women<br />

residing in Madrid, Spain, the mean breast milk mercury concentration was 9.5±5.5 ppb (range, 0.9–19 ppb)<br />

(Baluja et al. 1982). These authors did not provide any in<strong>for</strong>mation (i.e., whether females were fish<br />

consumers, the number of dental amalgams they had, or their occupations) that would explain the relatively<br />

high mercury levels. Skerfving (1988) reported mercury concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 6.3 ppb in breast<br />

milk of Swedish women that consumed fish; however, this author did not provide specific in<strong>for</strong>mation on the<br />

fish consumption rate or the number of dental amalgams of the study population. Most recently, Oskarsson<br />

et al. (1996) reported a mean total breast milk concentration of 0.6±0.4 ppb (range, 0.1–2.0 ppb) <strong>for</strong> a group<br />

of Swedish women that consumed freshwater fish <strong>and</strong> had an average of 12 amalgam fillings. This was a<br />

smaller range in mercury concentrations than that reported by Skerfving (1988).<br />

All of these general population breast milk mercury concentrations are in sharp contrast to those reported <strong>for</strong><br />

samples collected from women in Minamata, Japan, where industrial effluents containing methylmercury<br />

caused widespread contamination of local seafood. Breast milk total mercury concentrations were on the<br />

order of 63 ppb in individuals who lived in the vicinity of Minamata, Japan <strong>and</strong> had consumed highly<br />

mercury-contaminated fish (Fujita <strong>and</strong> Takabatake 1977). Similarly, in Iraq, where consumption of bread<br />

made from seed grain treated with methylmercury as a fungicide caused a similar mercury poisoning<br />

outbreak, breast milk concentrations as high as 200 ppb were reported (Bakir et al. 1973). Breast milk<br />

containing total mercury levels of >4 ppb would exceed the safe level (2 µg methylmercury/day <strong>for</strong> an<br />

average 5-kg infant) (Wolff 1983). It is important to emphasize, however, that in general, the beneficial<br />

effects associated with breast feeding seem to override or at least compensate <strong>for</strong> any neurotoxic effects on<br />

milestone development that could be due to the presence of contaminants, such as mercury, in human milk<br />

(Egel<strong>and</strong> et al. 1997).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!