25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 422<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

Most recently, the Northeast states <strong>and</strong> Eastern Canadian provinces issued their own mercury study,<br />

including a comprehensive analysis of current mercury concentrations in a variety of fresh water sportfish<br />

species (NESCAUM 1998). This study involved a large number of fish sampling sites in each state, many<br />

of which were remote lake sites that did not receive point source discharges. Top level piscivores (i.e.,<br />

predatory fish) such as walleye, chain pickerel, <strong>and</strong> large <strong>and</strong> smallmouth bass were typically found to<br />

exhibit some of the highest concentrations, with average tissue residues greater than 0.5 ppm <strong>and</strong><br />

maximum residues exceeding 2 ppm. One largemouth bass sample was found to contain 8.94 ppm of<br />

mercury, while one smallmouth bass sampled contained 5.0 ppm. A summary of the mean <strong>and</strong><br />

minimum–maximum (range) of mercury concentrations in 8 species of fish sampled is shown in<br />

Table 5-10. This study also identified a relationship between elevated mercury levels in fish <strong>and</strong> certain<br />

water quality parameters, including low pH, high conductivity, <strong>and</strong> elevated levels of dissolved organic<br />

carbon.<br />

Lake trout taken from Lake Ontario between 1977 <strong>and</strong> 1988 did show a progressive decline in mercury<br />

contamination from 0.24 µg/g (ppm) in 1977 to 0.12 µg/g (ppm) in 1988 (Borgmann <strong>and</strong> Whittle 1991).<br />

Samples of zooplankton taken from an Illinois lake in 1986 contained approximately 10 ng/g (ppb)<br />

mercury; however, fish that fed on the zooplankton had whole body mercury concentrations ranging from<br />

11.6 µg/kg (ppb) <strong>for</strong> inedible shad to 69 µg/kg (ppb) <strong>for</strong> edible largemouth bass, indicating<br />

bioaccumulation was occurring up the aquatic food chain. Older fish generally had higher mercury<br />

concentrations (Kohler et al. 1990). Mercury concentrations in crayfish taken from 13 Ontario lakes with<br />

no known mercury inputs ranged from 0.02 to 0.64 µg/g (ppm); the concentrations were positively<br />

correlated with organism weight <strong>and</strong> fish mercury concentrations (Allard <strong>and</strong> Stokes 1989). Brown trout<br />

taken from Lake Ontario contained between 0.18–0.21 µg/g (ppm) mercury in unskinned fillets <strong>and</strong><br />

between 0.24–0.26 µg/g (ppm) mercury in skinned fillets, indicating that methylmercury is associated with<br />

the protein fraction of fish tissue (Gutenmann <strong>and</strong> Lisk 1991).<br />

Methylmercury constitutes over 99% of the total mercury detected in fish muscle tissue, with no detection<br />

of inorganic or dimethylmercury (Grieb et al. 1990; Bloom 1992). Mercury levels were examined in<br />

aquatic organisms taken from the Calcasieu River/Lake Complex in Louisiana. The order of enrichment<br />

was as follows: shrimp (0.2 µg/g [ppm])

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!