25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 598<br />

8. REFERENCES<br />

*Soria ML, Sanz P, Martinez D, et al. 1992. Total mercury <strong>and</strong> methylmercury in hair maternal <strong>and</strong><br />

umbilical blood <strong>and</strong> placenta from women in the Seville area. Bull Environ Contam <strong>Toxic</strong>ol<br />

48(4):494-501.<br />

*Southworth GR, Peterson MJ, Turner RR. 1994. Changes in concentrations of selenium <strong>and</strong> mercury in<br />

largemouth bass following elimination of fly ash dishchrge to a quarry. Chemosphere 29(1):71-79.<br />

*Spencer JH, Voigt AF. 1968. Thermodynamics of the solution of mercury metal: I. Tracer<br />

determination. J Phys Chem 72:464-470.<br />

*Spyker JM, Smithberg M. 1972. Effects of methylmercury on prenatal development in mice. Teratology<br />

5:181-190.<br />

*Spyker JM, Sparber SB, Goldberg AM. 1972. Subtle consequences of methyl mercury exposure:<br />

Behavioral deviations in offspring of treated mothers. Science 177:621-623.<br />

*SRI. 1996. Stan<strong>for</strong>d Research Institute International. Directory of chemical producers: United States of<br />

America. Menlo Park, Ca: SRI International.<br />

*Stein ED, Cohen Y, Winer AM. 1996. Environmental distribution <strong>and</strong> trans<strong>for</strong>mation of mercury<br />

compounds. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 26(1):1-43.<br />

Stern AH. 1993. Re-evaluation of the reference dose <strong>for</strong> methylmercury <strong>and</strong> assessment of current<br />

exposure levels. Risk Analysis 13(3):355-364.<br />

*Stewart W, Guirgis H, S<strong>and</strong>erson J, et al. 1977. Urinary mercury excretion <strong>and</strong> proteinuria in pathology<br />

laboratory staff. Br J Ind Med 34:26-31.<br />

*Stockwell PB, Rabl P, Paffrath M. 1991. Monitoring elemental mercury in an urban environment.<br />

Process Control Qual 1(4):293-298.<br />

*Stokinger, H. 1981. Patty's industrial hygiene <strong>and</strong> toxicology. In: Clayton GD, Clayton FE, eds. 3rd ed,<br />

vol. IIA. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1769-1792.<br />

*Stoltenburg-Didinger G, Markwort S. 1990. Prenatal methylmercury exposure results in dendritic spine<br />

dysgenesis in rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12(6):573-576.<br />

*Stonard MD, Chater BR, Duffield DP, et al. 1983. An evaluation of renal function in workers<br />

occupationally exposed to mercury vapor. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 52:177-189.<br />

*Stop<strong>for</strong>d W, Bundy SD, Goldwater LJ, et al. 1978. Microenvironmental exposure to mercury vapor. Am<br />

Ind Hyg Assoc J 39:378-384.<br />

*Storm DL. 1994. Chemical monitoring of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia's public drinking water sources: Public exposures<br />

<strong>and</strong> health impacts. In: Wang RGM. Water contamination <strong>and</strong> health. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.,<br />

67-124.<br />

*Stoz F, Aicham P, Janovic S, et al. 1995. [Is a generalized amalgam ban justified? Studies of mothers <strong>and</strong><br />

their newborn infants] . Zeitschrift Fur Geburtshilfe Und Perinatologie (1):35-41. (German)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!