25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 256<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

domain-specific neuropsychological test results from the Seychelles are not yet available. When these results<br />

become available <strong>and</strong> if they fail to show domain-specific effects, this additional factor of 1.5 would no<br />

longer be needed. At that time ATSDR will re-evaluate its MRL, as well as all other relevant data, in<br />

compliance with the agency’s m<strong>and</strong>ates <strong>and</strong> authorities.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, in the calculation of the chronic oral MRL <strong>for</strong> methylmercury, the NOAEL of 0.0013 mg/kg/day<br />

from the 66-month study (Davidson et al. 1998) is divided by 4.5, giving a chronic oral MRL <strong>for</strong><br />

methylmercury of 0.0003 mg/kg/day [0.0013 mg/kg/day / 4.5 (UF) = 0.0003 mg/kg/day].<br />

Alternative Derivations of the MRL<br />

To ensure a health guidance value based upon the best use of the Seychelles study data (widely considered the<br />

most relevant data available), ATSDR evaluated alternate MRL derivation methods <strong>for</strong> methylmercury. One<br />

such approach is to use the mean total mercury level of 6.8 ppm in maternal hair <strong>for</strong> the entire Seychellois<br />

study cohort. Using the same <strong>for</strong>mula as in the previous MRL calculation,<br />

C = (0.95 x 0.05 x d) / (0.014 x 4.2)<br />

C = 0.81 d<br />

(1/250 x 6.8) = 0.027<br />

0.027 mg/L = 0.81 d<br />

d = 0.034 mg/day<br />

0.034 mg/day / 60 kg = 0.0006 mg/kg/day<br />

In consideration of uncertainty factors <strong>for</strong> this MRL approach, multiple factors also apply. In this case, the<br />

mean value of 6.8 ppm <strong>for</strong> the NOAEL is <strong>for</strong> the entire study cohort at 66 months (n = 711). An uncertainty<br />

factor of 1.5 was used to account <strong>for</strong> the pharmacokinetically based variability of hair-to-blood ratios (95%<br />

confidence level) in pregnant women <strong>and</strong> fetuses in the U.S. population (Clewell et al. 1998, 1999). The<br />

extremely large size of the study population (n=711), in combination with an uncertainty factor of 1.5, is<br />

considered adequate to encompass the full range of pharmacokinetic <strong>and</strong> pharmacodynamic variability<br />

within the human population. An independent modifying factor of 1.5 was also used to take into<br />

consideration the positive results of the domain-specific tests administered in the Faroe study (Gr<strong>and</strong>jean<br />

et al. 1997, 1998). The uncertainty factor of 1.5, multiplied by the modifying factor of 1.5, yields a total<br />

aggregate value of 2.25. Applying the factor of 2.25 to the daily intake calculated from the 6.8 ppm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!