25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 395<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

1991). Mercury may also be released to surface waters in effluents from a number of industrial processes,<br />

including chloralkali production, mining operations <strong>and</strong> ore processing, metallurgy <strong>and</strong> electroplating,<br />

chemical manufacturing, ink manufacturing, pulp <strong>and</strong> paper mills, leather tanning, pharmaceutical<br />

production, <strong>and</strong> textile manufacture (Dean et al. 1972; EPA 1971c). Discharges from a regional<br />

wastewater treatment facility on the St. Louis River that received primarily municipal wastes contained<br />

0.364 µg/L (ppb) of mercury, resulting in concentrations in the adjacent sediment of up to 5.07 µg/g (ppm)<br />

(Glass et al. 1990). Industrial effluents from a chemical manufacturing plant on the NPL (Stauffer<br />

Chemical’s LeMoyne, Alabama site) contained more than 10 ppm of mercury; these effluents had<br />

contaminated an adjacent swamp <strong>and</strong> watershed with mercury concentrations in the sediments ranging<br />

from 4.3 to 316 ppm (Hayes <strong>and</strong> Rodenbeck 1992). Effluent monitoring data collected under the National<br />

Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program were used to estimate pollutant loadings from<br />

effluent discharges to the San Francisco Bay Estuary between 1984 <strong>and</strong> 1987 (Davis et al. 1992). Of the<br />

1,030 samples of industrial effluents monitored entering the San Francisco Estuary during this period, 39%<br />

were found to contain mercury (Davis et al. 1992). Although these authors did not specify the limits of<br />

detection <strong>for</strong> mercury <strong>and</strong> did not provide quantitative in<strong>for</strong>mation on the concentrations detected, they did<br />

indicate that measurements <strong>for</strong> most of the priority pollutants including mercury were at or below the<br />

detection limit. This precluded quantitative assessment of spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal trends in calculating<br />

loadings to the estuary <strong>for</strong> all but four metals (Davis et al. 1992).<br />

According to the most recent <strong>Toxic</strong>s Release Inventory, in 1996, the estimated releases of 541 pounds of<br />

mercury to water from 31 large processing facilities accounted <strong>for</strong> about 0.64% of total environmental<br />

releases <strong>for</strong> this element (TRI96 1998). An addition 15 pounds of mercury were released indirectly to<br />

POTWs, <strong>and</strong> some of this volume ultimately may have been released to surface waters. This is<br />

approximately 215 pounds more mercury than was released to water directly or indirectly via POTWs in<br />

1994 (TRI94 1996), but 445 pounds less than that released to water either directly (144 pounds) or<br />

indirectly via POTWs (301 pounds) in 1991 (TRI91 1993). The TRI data listed in Tables 5-1 <strong>and</strong> 5-2<br />

should be used with some caution, since only certain types of facilities are required to report (EPA 1996f).<br />

This is not an exhaustive list.<br />

Mercury has been identified in surface water, groundwater, <strong>and</strong> leachate samples collected at 197, 395, <strong>and</strong><br />

58 sites, respectively, of the 714 NPL hazardous waste sites where it has been detected in some<br />

environmental media (HazDat 1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!