25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 473<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

reported in three amalgam studies. Patterson et al. (1985) measured elemental mercury in exhaled breath,<br />

<strong>and</strong> levels of mercury ranging from 0.0001 to 62 ng/L (ppb) (mean, 0.0082 µg/L [ppb]) were detected in<br />

167 persons with dental restorations, compared to 0.000008–0.0001 µg/L (ppb) (mean, 0.00006 µg/L [ppb])<br />

in 5 persons with no amalgams; however, these values were measured after the people had brushed their<br />

teeth. Jokstad et al. 1992 reported that mercury urine concentrations increased with increasing number of<br />

amalgams. Individuals with 36 to 39 dental amalgams had mercury urine levels of 6 ppb compared to<br />

1.2 ppb in individuals without amalgams. Mercury concentrations in whole blood were also higher in<br />

persons who ate no fish, but had >6 dental amalgam fillings (mean, 1.047±0.797 µg/L [ppb] as compared to<br />

persons who did not eat fish <strong>and</strong> had no dental amalgams (0.2±0.4 µg/L [ppb]) (Schweinberg 1994).<br />

Individuals who have large numbers of dental amalgams installed or replaced at one time are likely to exhibit<br />

transient elevated blood <strong>and</strong> urine mercury levels (PHS 1995).<br />

Individuals Exposed to Consumer Products <strong>and</strong> Medicinal Products Containing Mercury.<br />

Individual who use various consumer products containing mercury (i.e., medicinal herbal remedies, skin<br />

lightening creams <strong>and</strong> soaps, laxatives, tattoo dyes, fingerpaints, <strong>and</strong> make-up paints) are also exposed to<br />

higher mercury levels than the general population (Barr et al. 1973; Dyall-Smith <strong>and</strong> Scurry 1990; Espinoza<br />

et al. 1995; Geffner <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong>ler 1980; Lauwerys et al. 1987; Rastogi 1992; Wendroff 1990). Metallic<br />

mercury has been used by Mexican American <strong>and</strong> Asian populations in traditional remedies <strong>for</strong> a variety of<br />

medical conditions, including chronic stomach disorders. Several papers have been published related to the<br />

use of metallic mercury as a folk remedy (ATSDR 1992, 1997; Department of Health 1997; Geffner <strong>and</strong><br />

S<strong>and</strong>ler 1980; Hartman 1995; Johnson [in press]; Trotter 1985; Wendroff 1990, 1991; Zayas <strong>and</strong> Ozuah<br />

1996). Some Mexican-Americans believe that disorders of the alimentary tract may be caused by a bolus of<br />

food adhering to the stomach wall, a condition known as empacho. Geffner <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong>ler (1980) reported<br />

cases of two young patients with acute gastroenteritis who received traditional remedies of oral<br />

administration of metallic mercury, presumably to dislodge the bolus. Both patients were successfully<br />

treated <strong>and</strong> released from the hospital after 2 <strong>and</strong> 10 days of treatment, respectively. Trotter (1985) reported<br />

that metallic mercury known as azogue is in common use in New Mexico <strong>and</strong> the bordering areas <strong>for</strong> treating<br />

this gastrointestinal condition, empacho. Metallic mercury was also implicated in two cases of mercury<br />

poisoning caused by the dermal application of an over-the-counter antilice product (Bourgeois et al. 1986).<br />

W<strong>and</strong>s et al. (1974) reported the deaths of two individuals due to the excessive use of a laxative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!