25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 179<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

1992; Nielsen <strong>and</strong> Andersen 1991a, 1991b; Soria et al. 1992; Suzuki et al. 1992). Hair mercury levels,<br />

determined using segmental hair analysis, can be used to monitor exposure to mercury <strong>and</strong> may leave a<br />

historical record of exposure or uptake (Phelps et al. 1980; Suzuki et al. 1992). The concentration of<br />

mercury in the hair is considered proportional to the concentration of mercury in the blood. Correlations<br />

can be drawn to determine blood concentrations of mercury relative to its concentration in the hair (see the<br />

discussion of the methylmercury MRL in Section 2.5). Mercury concentrations in maternal hair were<br />

significantly correlated with cord blood levels of mercury in pregnant women who had frequently ingested<br />

whale meat throughout pregnancy (Gr<strong>and</strong>jean et al. 1992). The frequent ingestion of whale meat dinners<br />

during pregnancy <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser degree, the frequent consumption of fish, as well as increased parity or<br />

age, were associated with high mercury concentrations in cord blood <strong>and</strong> hair. The incorporation of<br />

mercury into hair is irreversible; the loss of hair mercury occurs as the result of hair loss (Nielsen <strong>and</strong><br />

Andersen 1991b).<br />

As with metallic mercury, methylmercury can readily traverse the placental barrier. In humans with no<br />

known exposure to mercury, blood mercury levels increased with advancing gestation such that the mean<br />

blood mercury level on admission <strong>for</strong> delivery (1.15 ppb) was significantly higher than that of the first<br />

prenatal visit (0.79 ppb) (Kuntz et al. 1982). Cord blood levels were similar to maternal blood values in<br />

labor <strong>and</strong> postpartum. Concentrations of methylmercury in the fetal blood are slightly higher than in the<br />

maternal blood (Inouye <strong>and</strong> Kajiwara 1988; Kuhnert et al. 1981). Following an oral dose of methylmercuric<br />

chloride during gestation, accumulation of mercury was much greater in the fetal kidneys than in<br />

the maternal kidneys of guinea pigs (Inouye <strong>and</strong> Kajiwara 1988). Mercury levels in the liver were slightly<br />

higher in the fetus compared to the dam when exposed to organic mercury at late gestation but were<br />

similar at early gestation. Distribution of mercury in the maternal <strong>and</strong> fetal brains was uneven, with the<br />

highest concentrations in the neopallium, diencephalon, <strong>and</strong> mesencephalon <strong>and</strong> the lowest in the<br />

rhombencephalon. Exposure at later gestational weeks resulted in higher concentrations <strong>for</strong> both maternal<br />

<strong>and</strong> fetal brains (Inouye <strong>and</strong> Kajiwara 1988).<br />

Methylmercury may also be secreted in mother's milk (Bakir et al. 1973). Following intravenous dosing of<br />

methylmercuric chloride (1.6 mg Hg/kg) to pregnant mice on one of days 9–17 of pregnancy, methyl­<br />

mercury was readily transferred to the fetuses from the mothers more predominantly at the later gestational<br />

stage (Inouye <strong>and</strong> Kajiwara 1990). The placental transfer of methylmercury was more efficient compared<br />

to the lactational transfer in rats exposed to methylmercury in the diet during 11 weeks prior to mating,<br />

during gestation, <strong>and</strong> during lactation (Sundberg <strong>and</strong> Oskarsson 1992). A higher concentration of mercury

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!