25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 419<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

remaining sites were near industrial areas. However, the mercury sources could not be identified at all of<br />

these sites. Five sites were considered to represent background conditions <strong>and</strong> six U.S. Geological Survey<br />

(USGS) National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN) sites were also among the sites in the<br />

top 10th percentile (EPA 1992f).<br />

A recent national survey conducted by the EPA solicited data on mercury concentrations in fish collected<br />

by the states as part of their fish contaminant monitoring programs (EPA 1997b). The EPA asked all states<br />

to submit mercury residue data collected from their fish sampling programs from 1990 through 1995 to<br />

assess whether there were geographic variations or trends in fish tissue concentrations of mercury. Thirtynine<br />

states provided in<strong>for</strong>mation on the levels of contamination in their fish. The study included the<br />

following: in<strong>for</strong>mation on the tissue concentrations of mercury, including the number of fish sampled (by<br />

species); the mean mercury concentration; <strong>and</strong> the minimum, median, <strong>and</strong> maximum concentrations<br />

reported <strong>for</strong> each species by state. Residue in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> the three most abundant species sampled in<br />

each state included such species as the largemouth <strong>and</strong> smallmouth bass; channel, flathead, <strong>and</strong> blue<br />

catfish; brown <strong>and</strong> yellow bullhead; rainbow <strong>and</strong> lake trout; carp; walleye; north pike; <strong>and</strong> white sucker.<br />

The highest mean mercury residue <strong>for</strong> an edible species was 1.4 ppm, reported by the state of Arizona; the<br />

highest maximum mercury concentrations were 7.0 ppm <strong>for</strong> bowfin in South Carolina, followed by<br />

6.4 ppm <strong>for</strong> white sucker in Ohio <strong>and</strong> 5.7 ppm <strong>for</strong> bowfin in North Carolina. (Note: This EPA report is<br />

currently under review by the states; however, the <strong>final</strong> report should be available by December 1998).<br />

A summary of the mean, minimum, <strong>and</strong> maximum tissue concentrations of mercury detected <strong>for</strong> two of the<br />

sampled species with the widest geographical distribution; the largemouth bass <strong>and</strong> the channel catfish are<br />

given in Tables 5-8 <strong>and</strong> 5-9. As Table 5-8 shows, the maximum mercury residues reported <strong>for</strong> the<br />

largemouth bass exceeded the FDA action level (1 ppm) in 15 of the 25 states that collected <strong>and</strong> analyzed<br />

tissue samples <strong>for</strong> this species. The highest maximum mercury concentration reported <strong>for</strong> this species was<br />

4.36 ppm, reported by Florida. Table 5-9 shows the maximum mercury residue reported <strong>for</strong> another<br />

widely distributed species, the channel catfish. While the maximum mercury residues reported <strong>for</strong> this<br />

species are not consistently as high as those <strong>for</strong> the largemouth bass, maximum residues in channel catfish<br />

from 6 of the 20 reporting states still exceeded the FDA action level (1 ppm). The highest maximum value<br />

reported <strong>for</strong> the channel catfish was 2.57 ppm, reported by Arkansas. Consumption of large amounts of<br />

feral fish containing these high mercury residues exposes high-end fish consuming populations (those that<br />

consume >100 grams fish/day) to potentially greater risk of mercury exposure than members of the general<br />

population (see Sections 5.5 <strong>and</strong> 5.7).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!