25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY 442<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

uptake is still below the dose corresponding to the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of mercury. The ADI of<br />

40 µg total mercury, 30 µg of which are allowed <strong>for</strong> methylmercury, results in a total dose of approximately<br />

30 µg after accounting <strong>for</strong> absorption (Halbach 1994; WHO 1976). WHO (1990) estimates a daily<br />

absorption of 2.61 µg from background exposure <strong>for</strong> persons without amalgam exposure.<br />

In a recent study by Schweinsberg (1994), the author monitored mercury in blood, urine, <strong>and</strong> hair of<br />

subjects with amalgam fillings, in subjects who consumed fish, <strong>and</strong> in mercury-exposed workers. With<br />

respect to hair concentrations, the author reported a mean mercury level in hair of 560 µg/kg (ppb),<br />

940 µg/kg, <strong>and</strong> 1,600 µg/kg in subjects that consumed the following mean amounts of fish per month:<br />

120 g/month (range, 0–6 dental amalgams, 2.56±2.123 µg/L <strong>for</strong> persons with fish consumption >990 g/month<br />

<strong>and</strong> no dental amalgams, <strong>and</strong> 2.852±2.363 µg/l <strong>for</strong> persons with fish consumption >990 g/month <strong>and</strong><br />

>6 dental amalgams. Mercury concentrations in the urine of occupationally exposed thermometer factory<br />

workers were higher, by a factor of 100, than in the group with amalgam fillings. The author concluded<br />

that both amalgam fillings <strong>and</strong> the consumption of fish burden individuals with mercury in approximately<br />

the same order of magnitude.<br />

In a more recent study of lactating women, Oskarsson et al. (1996) assessed the total <strong>and</strong> inorganic mercury<br />

content in breast milk <strong>and</strong> blood in relation to fish consumption <strong>and</strong> amalgam fillings. The total mercury<br />

concentrations (mean±st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation) in breast milk, blood, <strong>and</strong> hair samples collected 6 weeks after<br />

delivery from 30 Swedish women were 0.6±0.4 ng/g (ppb), 2.3±1.0 ng/g, <strong>and</strong> 0.28±0.16 µg/g, respectively.<br />

In milk, an average of 51% of total mercury was in the inorganic <strong>for</strong>m, whereas in blood an average of only<br />

26% was in the inorganic <strong>for</strong>m. Total <strong>and</strong> inorganic mercury levels in blood <strong>and</strong> milk were correlated with<br />

the number of amalgam fillings. The concentrations of total mercury <strong>and</strong> organic mercury in blood <strong>and</strong> total<br />

mercury in hair were correlated with the estimated recent exposure to methylmercury via consumption of<br />

fish. There was no significant difference between the milk levels of mercury in any <strong>for</strong>m <strong>and</strong> the estimated<br />

methylmercury intake. A significant correlation was found, however, between the levels of total mercury in<br />

blood <strong>and</strong> in milk, with milk levels being an average of 27% of the blood levels. There was also an<br />

association between inorganic mercury in blood <strong>and</strong> in milk; the average level of inorganic mercury in milk<br />

was 55% of the level of inorganic mercury in blood. No significant correlations were found between the<br />

levels of any <strong>for</strong>m of mercury in milk <strong>and</strong> the levels of organic mercury in blood. The results indicated that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!