25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MERCURY<br />

2.2.1.5 Reproductive Effects<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

Metallic Mercury. No acute-duration exposure data were located regarding reproductive effects in humans<br />

after inhalation exposure to metallic mercury. However, several studies found no effect on fertility<br />

following intermediate or chronic inhalation exposure to metallic mercury in humans (Alcser et al. 1989;<br />

Cordier et al. 1991; Lauwerys et al. 1985). A retrospective cohort study reported that male workers in a<br />

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) plant exposed <strong>for</strong> at least 4 months had urinary mercury concentrations<br />

of 2,144–8,572 µg/L (Alcser et al. 1989). This sample population showed no significant difference in<br />

fertility compared to controls (unexposed workers); however, they were never monitored <strong>for</strong> elemental<br />

mercury exposure. In a questionnaire study assessing the fertility of male workers exposed to mercury<br />

vapor from various industries (i.e., zinc-mercury amalgam, chloralkali, or electrical equipment product<br />

plants), there was no statistically significant difference in the number of children of the exposed group<br />

compared to a matched control group (Lauwerys et al. 1985). The concentration of mercury in the urine of<br />

these exposed workers ranged from 5.1 to 272.1 µg/g creatinine. No correlation was observed between<br />

prolactin, testosterone, luteinizing hormone, <strong>and</strong> follicle stimulating hormone levels <strong>and</strong> blood or urine<br />

mercury levels in male workers exposed to mercury vapors (Erfurth et al. 1990; McGregor <strong>and</strong> Mason<br />

1991). Also, no effect on the response of these hormones to challenge with gonadotropin releasing<br />

hormone was observed (Erfurth et al. 1990).<br />

Although no effect on fertility was observed in exposed workers, an increase in the rate of spontaneous<br />

abortions was reported in association with increased mercury concentrations in the urine of the fathers<br />

exposed to metallic mercury in chloralkali plants be<strong>for</strong>e the pregnancy (Cordier et al. 1991). There was a<br />

significantly increased risk of spontaneous abortion, at a rate of 18.4%, when fathers had more than<br />

50 µg/L mercury in the urine, compared to a rate of 8.6% when fathers were unexposed. Sikorski et al.<br />

1987) reported that women occupationally exposed to metallic mercury vapors (dentists <strong>and</strong> dental<br />

assistants) had more reproductive failures (spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, congenital mal<strong>for</strong>mations) <strong>and</strong><br />

irregular, painful, or hemorrhagic menstrual disorders than a control (unexposed) group of women. The<br />

reproductive difficulties <strong>and</strong> menstrual disorders were correlated with mercury levels identified in scalp <strong>and</strong><br />

pubic hair collected from the women. It should be noted that this study has been recently severely criticized<br />

<strong>for</strong> what Larsson (1995) calls "erroneous interpretation of results <strong>and</strong> distortion of conclusions." The<br />

Sikorski et al. (1987) paper is nonetheless presented in this toxicological profile as part of the available<br />

published data on reported human mercury exposure. Its presence here is based upon its publication in a<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!