25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 240<br />

Supporting Studies<br />

2. HEALTH EFFECTS<br />

Crump et al. (1998) conducted benchmark dose (BMD) calculations <strong>and</strong> additional regression analyses of<br />

data collected in a study in which a series of scholastic <strong>and</strong> psychological tests were administered to<br />

children whose mothers had been exposed to methylmercury during pregnancy. Hair samples were<br />

collected from 10,970 new mothers in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> in 1977 <strong>and</strong> 1978. High hair mercury levels were<br />

considered to be those over 6 ppm, which was the hair level predicted to result at steady state from<br />

consumption of mercury at the WHO/FAO Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake of 0.3 mg total<br />

mercury/week <strong>and</strong> 0.2 mg methylmercury/week. By this criterion, 73 of approximately 1,000 mothers who<br />

had consumed fish more than 3 times/week during pregnancy were determined to have high hair mercury<br />

levels. In 1985, when the children were 6 to 7 years of age, 61 children (1 set of twins) of the 73 mothers in<br />

the high hair mercury group were located; these children constituted the high exposure group, which was<br />

matched with three control groups (one with 3–6 ppm maternal hair mercury levels, one with 0–3 ppm<br />

whose mothers had been high fish consumers, <strong>and</strong> one with 0–3 ppm whose mothers had not been high fish<br />

consumers). The entire study cohort consisted of 237 children. A battery of 26 psychological <strong>and</strong><br />

scholastic tests were administered to the children at school during the year 1985. Mothers were interviewed<br />

at the time of test administration to obtain additional data on social <strong>and</strong> environmental factors. In the high<br />

exposure group of children, one boy’s mother had a hair mercury level of 86 ppm, which was more than<br />

four times higher than the next highest hair mercury level of 20 ppm. BMDs (10% response rate) calculated<br />

from five tests ranged from 32 to 73 ppm, when the 86 ppm mother’s child was included. This<br />

corresponded to a BMDL range of 17 to 24 ppm. Although none of the 86 ppm child’s test scores was an<br />

outlier according to the definition used in the analyses, his scores were significantly influential in the<br />

analyses. When this child was omitted from the analyses, BMDs ranged from 13 to 21, with corresponding<br />

BMDLs of 7.4 to 10 ppm.<br />

Developing fetuses in the SCDS were exposed through maternal fish ingestion be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>and</strong> during<br />

pregnancy. Each child was evaluated at 19 months <strong>and</strong> again at 29 months (±2 weeks) <strong>for</strong> infant<br />

intelligence (Bayley Scales of Infant Development [BSID] Mental <strong>and</strong> Psychomotor Scales), with a<br />

modified version of the BSID Infant Behavior Record to measure adaptive behaviors at 29 months<br />

(Davidson et al. 1995b). Testing was per<strong>for</strong>med by a team of Seychellois nurses extensively trained in<br />

administration of the BSID. Maternal hair concentrations, measured in hair segments that corresponded to<br />

pregnancy, ranged from 0.5 to 26.7 ppm, with a median exposure of 5.9 ppm <strong>for</strong> the entire study group.<br />

The mean BSID Mental Scale Indices determined at both 19 <strong>and</strong> 29 months were found to be comparable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!