25.12.2012 Views

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

revised final - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MERCURY 464<br />

5. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE<br />

boots which were soaked with mercury were taken home, exposing family members. Cases of mine<br />

workers’ homes being contaminated have also been reported, although the authors did not address the impact<br />

of this contamination on the health of the family members (West <strong>and</strong> Lim 1968). Although prevention of<br />

this kind of employee transport of mercury to homes is preferred, cleaning homes of workers occupationally<br />

exposed to mercury can be effective in reducing exposure <strong>for</strong> family members (Zirschky 1990).<br />

5.7 POPULATIONS WITH POTENTIALLY HIGH EXPOSURES<br />

In addition to individuals who are occupationally exposed to mercury (Section 5.5), there are several groups<br />

within the general population with potentially high exposures (i.e., higher than background levels) to<br />

metallic mercury <strong>and</strong> various mercury compounds. Historically, populations that have been exposed to<br />

higher-than-normal background levels of mercury in the air, water, soil, <strong>and</strong>/or food have included<br />

populations near industrial discharges (e.g., Minamata <strong>and</strong> Niigata, Japan) <strong>and</strong> those who inadvertently<br />

consumed methylmercury-contaminated food (e.g., grain in Iraq) (WHO 1990, 1991). People living in<br />

proximity to <strong>for</strong>mer mercury production facilities or mines, secondary mercury production (recycling)<br />

facilities, chloralkali facilities, municipal <strong>and</strong> medical waste incinerators, other mercury-disposal or<br />

recycling facilities, or the 714 current or <strong>for</strong>mer NPL hazardous waste sites where mercury has been detected<br />

(HazDat 1998) are at risk of receiving potentially higher-than-normal background levels of exposure.<br />

Populations with potentially high exposure include recreational <strong>and</strong> subsistence fishers <strong>and</strong> hunters, Native<br />

American populations who routinely consume larger amounts of locally caught fish than the general<br />

population or who consume marine mammals in their diet. Other populations with potential <strong>for</strong> higher than<br />

average exposures are individuals with large numbers of dental amalgams, those who use various consumer<br />

products containing mercury (i.e., skin lightening creams <strong>and</strong> soaps, ethnic remedies, or fingerpaints <strong>and</strong><br />

make-up paints containing mercury or mercury compounds), <strong>and</strong> those living or working in buildings<br />

recently painted with mercury-containing latex paints or buildings where mercury has been intentionally or<br />

unintentionally spilled.<br />

Individuals Living Near Mercury Production, Use, <strong>and</strong> Disposal Sites. Individuals in the<br />

general population living in the vicinity of <strong>for</strong>mer primary production or mining sites or current secondary<br />

production sites, chloralkali plants, pulp <strong>and</strong> paper mills, coal-fired power plants, facilities where mercury is<br />

released (e.g., municipal waste or medical waste incinerators or other waste disposal facilities), or hazardous

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!