05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 Chapter 5. Towards unsolvable equations<br />

upon combinations, i.e. permutations — inside which the solution could be investi-<br />

gated. However, for equations <strong>of</strong> the fifth and higher degrees the required number <strong>of</strong><br />

calculations and combinations would be exceeding practical possibilities.<br />

“<strong>The</strong>se are, if I am not mistaken, the true principles <strong>of</strong> the solution <strong>of</strong> equations,<br />

and the most appropriate analysis leading to it. As one can see, it all comes<br />

down to a sort <strong>of</strong> calculus <strong>of</strong> combinations, by which one finds à priori the results<br />

for which one should be prepared. It should, by the way, be applicable to<br />

equations <strong>of</strong> the fifth degree and higher degrees, <strong>of</strong> which the solution is until<br />

now unknown. But this application demands a too great number <strong>of</strong> researches<br />

and combinations, <strong>of</strong> which the success is still in serious doubt, for us to follow<br />

this path in the present work. We hope, though, to be able to follow it at another<br />

time, and we content ourselves by having laid the foundations <strong>of</strong> a theory which<br />

appears to us to be new and general.” 69<br />

LAGRANGE never wrote the definitive work which he had reserved the right to<br />

do. By the time GALOIS had substantiated LAGRANGE’S claim for generality and ap-<br />

plicability <strong>of</strong> his theory <strong>of</strong> combinations (see chapter 8.5), LAGRANGE was no longer<br />

around to celebrate the ultimate vindication <strong>of</strong> his research in the field <strong>of</strong> algebraic<br />

solubility.<br />

Both WARING and LAGRANGE believed by 1770 that their theories were the nec-<br />

essary stepping stones towards the study <strong>of</strong> solutions to general equations. However,<br />

they both acknowledged that the amount <strong>of</strong> work required to apply these theories to<br />

the quintic equation was beyond their own limitations. Before the end <strong>of</strong> the century,<br />

even more radical opinions were voiced in print.<br />

5.4.2 Outright impossibility<br />

In the introduction to his first pro<strong>of</strong> (published 1799 but constructed two years earlier)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Fundamental <strong>The</strong>orem <strong>of</strong> Algebra, GAUSS gave detailed discussions and criticisms<br />

<strong>of</strong> previously attempted pro<strong>of</strong>s. In EULER’S attempt dating back to 1749, GAUSS found<br />

the implicit assumption that any polynomial equation could be solved by radicals.<br />

“In a few words: It is without sufficient reason assumed that the solution <strong>of</strong><br />

any equation can be reduced to the resolution <strong>of</strong> pure equations. Perhaps it would<br />

not be too difficult to prove the impossibility for the fifth degree with all rigor; I<br />

will communicate my investigations on this subject on another occasion. At this<br />

place, it suffices to emphasize that the general solution <strong>of</strong> equations, in this sense,<br />

69 “Voilà, si je me ne trompe, les vrais principes de la résolution des équations et l’analyse la plus<br />

propre à y conduire; tout se réduit, comme on voit, à une espèce de calcul des combinaisons, par<br />

lequel on trouve à priori les résultats auxquels on doit s’attendre. Il serait à propos d’en faire<br />

l’application aux équations du cinquième degré et des degrés supérieurs, dont la résolution est<br />

jusqu’à présent inconnue; mais cette application demande un trop grand nombre de recherches et<br />

de combinaisons, dont le succés est encore d’ailleurs fort douteux, pour que nous puissions quant<br />

à présent nous livrer à ce travail; nous espérons cependant pouvoir y revenir dans un autre temps,<br />

et nous nous contenterons ici d’avoir posé les fondements d’une théorie qui nous paraît nouvelle et<br />

générale.” (Lagrange, 1770–1771, 403).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!