05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

170 Chapter 8. A grand theory in spe<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> the irreducible equation. With the first theorems and the lemmata<br />

described above, ABEL was in a position to give a construction <strong>of</strong> the irreducible equa-<br />

tion which a given algebraic expression satisfied. More importantly, this construction<br />

allowed him to demonstrate that central properties <strong>of</strong> this equation could be deduced<br />

from properties <strong>of</strong> the initially given algebraic expression. ABEL let<br />

am = f ( µm √ ym, µ √<br />

m−1 ym−1, . . . )<br />

denote a given algebraic expression and constructed the irreducible equation ψ (y) = 0<br />

which would have am as a root in the following way.<br />

Since am was to satisfy ψ (y) = 0, it would be necessary that y − am was a factor <strong>of</strong><br />

ψ. By the theorem 10, it followed that<br />

φ1 (y, m1) = ∏ (y − am)<br />

would also be a factor. Because y − am was a first degree polynomial and, therefore,<br />

irreducible, it followed that φ1 was also irreducible (by theorem 11). Consequently,<br />

φ1 was an irreducible factor <strong>of</strong> ψ (y) and the procedure could be repeated yielding a<br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> irreducible factors<br />

φn (y, mn) = ∏ φn−1 (y, mn−1) ,<br />

in which the radicals <strong>of</strong> am were sequentially removed by the analogue <strong>of</strong> multiplying<br />

with the complex conjugate (c.f. section 6.3.2).<br />

ABEL claimed that the sequence <strong>of</strong> positive integers m1, m2, . . . was decreasing but<br />

gave no explicit argument. However, by J. L. LAGRANGE’S (1736–1813) theorem (sec-<br />

tion 5.2.3) it is not hard to see that ∏ am is a rational function <strong>of</strong> ym and the inner<br />

radicals involved. <strong>The</strong>refore, the order <strong>of</strong> ∏ am is less than the order <strong>of</strong> am. Thus,<br />

at a certain point (after, say, u steps) the sequence m1, m2, . . . had to vanish, and an<br />

equation would be obtained in which all the coefficients were rationally known. This<br />

equation was the sought-for ψ (y) = 0,<br />

ψ (y) = φu (y, 0) = ∏ φu−1 (y, mu−1) .<br />

Directly from this construction, ABEL deduced his characterization <strong>of</strong> the irre-<br />

ducible equation satisfied by a given algebraic expression, laying the foundations for<br />

his further reasoning. He summarized the properties in the following four points: 15<br />

Proposition 1 <strong>The</strong> following four results link properties <strong>of</strong> the irreducible equation ψ (y) = 0<br />

satisfied by a given algebraic expression am to properties <strong>of</strong> the expression itself:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> ψ is the product <strong>of</strong> certain exponents <strong>of</strong> root extractions occurring in am.<br />

Among these exponents, the one <strong>of</strong> the outer-most root extractions is always present.<br />

15 (N. H. <strong>Abel</strong>, [1828] 1839, 232–233)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!