05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.10. Aspects <strong>of</strong> ABEL’s binomial paper 261<br />

seems justified to say that ABEL held a strictly algebraic view <strong>of</strong> complex numbers<br />

and that he considered these numbers rather unproblematic.<br />

Because some <strong>of</strong> ABEL’S initial theorems — in particular Lehrsatz IV — dealt with<br />

power series, they have subsequently been interpreted as pertaining to complex vari-<br />

ables. However, there is no absolute indication that this was the interpretation which<br />

ABEL held. ABEL’S original formulations were not very explicit about these issues<br />

and <strong>of</strong>ten neglected taking numerical values into consideration. However, I find very<br />

little reason to suspect that ABEL would develop his theorems for complex variables<br />

and afterwards go through rather cumbersome arguments to reduce complex series to<br />

series <strong>of</strong> real terms.<br />

Going through ABEL’S loans from the Christiania University library, V. BRUN (1885–<br />

1978) discovered that ABEL had — in 1822 — borrowed the volume <strong>of</strong> the transactions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Danish Academy in which his fellow Norwegian C. WESSEL (1745–1818) had<br />

published his geometric interpretation <strong>of</strong> complex numbers as directed line segments<br />

in the plane. 64 However, as Ø. ORE (1899–1968) also pointed out, ABEL was prob-<br />

ably much more interested in a paper on equations which C. F. DEGEN (1766–1825)<br />

published in the same volume. 65 Even if ABEL read WESSEL’S paper — which seems a<br />

reasonable assumption given the limited amount <strong>of</strong> Danish mathematical literature —<br />

he certainly never did anything to adopt its idea or promote it in any other way. This<br />

just supports K. ANDERSEN’S (⋆1941) hypothesis that the geometrical interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> complex numbers was not a hot topic in the first decades <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century. 66<br />

12.10.2 ABEL on functional equations<br />

As had been the case in both EULER’S and CAUCHY’S pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the binomial theorem,<br />

functional equations played a central part in ABEL’S pro<strong>of</strong>. In his Cours d’analyse,<br />

CAUCHY had developed the topic into a theory <strong>of</strong> its own and he studied multiple<br />

types <strong>of</strong> functional equations. 67<br />

In a paper published in 1827 in CRELLE’S Journal, 68 ABEL presented some results<br />

on functional equations, which when applied to the functional equation<br />

φ (x) + φ (y) = φ (x + y) (12.27)<br />

gave the solution φ (x) = Ax as the unique (continuous) solution to this equation.<br />

It was precisely this functional equation which was central to ABEL’S pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

binomial theorem. Whereas EULER and CAUCHY had used the equation<br />

f (x) f (y) = f (x + y)<br />

64 (Brun, 1962, 110–111). For an analysis <strong>of</strong> WESSEL’S work, see (K. Andersen, 1999).<br />

65 (C. F. Degen, 1799).<br />

66 (K. Andersen, 1999, 94).<br />

67 (J. Dhombres, 1992).<br />

68 (N. H. <strong>Abel</strong>, 1827c).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!