05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16.3. <strong>The</strong> division problem 315<br />

Based on a direct application <strong>of</strong> the addition formulae, ABEL obtained an expression<br />

� �<br />

2µ ¯ωi<br />

φ1 β ± = Rµ ± R<br />

2n + 1<br />

′ �<br />

µ (1 − c2x2 ) (1 + e2x2 )<br />

in which Rµ and R ′ µ were rational functions <strong>of</strong> x = φ (β). Consequently, ABEL found<br />

that both the functions<br />

ψ (β) ψ1 (β) = λ (β) and ψ (β) 2n+1 + ψ1 (β) 2n+1 = λ1 (β) (16.9)<br />

were rational in x. By direct calculation, he also found that both functions (16.9) were<br />

invariant if another root β + kω+k′ ¯ωi<br />

2n+1<br />

<strong>of</strong> the equation<br />

φ ((2n + 1) β) = P2n+1<br />

Q2n+1<br />

(16.10)<br />

was substituted for β. Thus, ABEL knew that λ (β) and λ1 (β) were rational in the<br />

coefficients <strong>of</strong> (16.10), in particular in the quantity φ ((2n + 1) β). When he solved the<br />

system <strong>of</strong> equations (16.9), ABEL found<br />

ψ (β) = 2n+1<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�λ1 (β)<br />

2 +<br />

�<br />

λ1 (β) 2<br />

4<br />

− λ (β). (16.11)<br />

From these, ABEL obtained φ1 (β) and then φ (β) by similar arguments.<br />

However, as ABEL observed, the formula for φ (β) which he had obtained also<br />

contained the quantities<br />

� �<br />

ω<br />

φ<br />

2n + 1<br />

� �<br />

¯ωi<br />

and φ .<br />

2n + 1<br />

Thus, in order to completely solve the problem, these two quantities should also be<br />

determined and ABEL demonstrated how the equation P2n+1 = 0 which determined<br />

these could be reduced to equations <strong>of</strong> lower degrees, one <strong>of</strong> degree 2n + 2 and 2n + 2<br />

equations <strong>of</strong> degree n. Furthermore, ABEL also proved that the equations <strong>of</strong> degree<br />

n were always solvable by radicals. In the process, ABEL employed tools similar to<br />

those described above as well as some knowledge <strong>of</strong> primitive roots <strong>of</strong> an integer. Im-<br />

portantly, ABEL knew qualitatively how the roots were interrelated (by 16.8) and used<br />

this knowledge to investigate the system <strong>of</strong> roots and prove its reduction to equations<br />

<strong>of</strong> lower degree, some <strong>of</strong> which were proved to be solvable by radicals.<br />

16.3.1 Division <strong>of</strong> the lemniscate<br />

<strong>The</strong> culmination <strong>of</strong> ABEL’S research into the division problem was his application <strong>of</strong><br />

the theory to the case <strong>of</strong> the lemniscate. <strong>The</strong> symmetry <strong>of</strong> ABEL’S representation <strong>of</strong><br />

the elliptic integrals became evident when he chose e = c = 1 to obtain the lemniscate<br />

integral<br />

φ (α) = x, α =<br />

� x<br />

0<br />

dx<br />

√ 1 − x 4 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!