05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214 Chapter 11. CAUCHY’s new foundation for analysis<br />

Thus, the limit <strong>of</strong> f (x) 1 x belonged to the same arbitrarily small interval as the limit<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

f (x+1)<br />

f (x) , and thus the two limits were equal. Now, the ratio test followed by letting<br />

f (n) = un and observing that the limits <strong>of</strong> n√ un and u n+1<br />

un coincided.<br />

11.5 CAUCHY’s pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the binomial theorem<br />

CAUCHY agreed with his predecessors in considering the binomial theorem a corner<br />

stone <strong>of</strong> the calculus. His pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> it relied on and promoted two <strong>of</strong> his new techniques<br />

and concepts in analysis: those <strong>of</strong> functional equations and continuous functions. 18 As<br />

EULER had done, CAUCHY considered the functional equation<br />

<strong>of</strong> which he knew that the binomial<br />

f (m) f (n) = f (m + n) (11.2)<br />

f (m) = (1 + x) m<br />

(11.3)<br />

was a continuous solution for all m provided x was fixed. On the other hand, the<br />

function defined by the infinite series<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

k=0<br />

� �<br />

m<br />

x<br />

k<br />

k<br />

(11.4)<br />

was also a solution to the functional equation (11.2) under the assumptions that it<br />

converged and m was a rational number.<br />

To demonstrate that the series (11.4) satisfied the functional equation, CAUCHY<br />

had to be able to multiply infinite series. He invented a way <strong>of</strong> multiplying absolutely<br />

convergent series which rigorously established the convergence <strong>of</strong> the product. 19 Based<br />

on the argument which EULER had also used, CAUCHY then knew that the series (11.4)<br />

coincided with f (m) for all rational values <strong>of</strong> m. <strong>The</strong>refore, the general equality <strong>of</strong><br />

(11.3) and (11.4) would be proved if the series was a continuous function <strong>of</strong> m. In order<br />

to prove the continuity <strong>of</strong> the series (11.4), CAUCHY devised and proved a general<br />

theorem to the effect that a convergent sum <strong>of</strong> continuous functions was always a<br />

continuous function. Later, this theorem would arouse much controversy (see below).<br />

CAUCHY’S way <strong>of</strong> multiplying infinite series. In the Cours d’analyse, CAUCHY in-<br />

vented a way <strong>of</strong> multiplying two absolutely convergent series such that the product<br />

would be a new convergent series. As he had done throughout, CAUCHY developed<br />

his theory <strong>of</strong> infinite series in three steps:<br />

1. Series <strong>of</strong> real, positive terms (section VI.2)<br />

18 For CAUCHY’S theory <strong>of</strong> functional equations, see (J. Dhombres, 1992).<br />

19 (A.-L. Cauchy, 1821a, 157).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!