05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 Chapter 5. Towards unsolvable equations<br />

polynomial equations were complex, i.e. <strong>of</strong> the form a + b √ −1 for real a, b, was raised;<br />

and around the time <strong>of</strong> C. F. GAUSS (1777–1855), the theorem acquired the name <strong>of</strong><br />

the Fundamental <strong>The</strong>orem <strong>of</strong> Algebra.<br />

When G. W. LEIBNIZ (1646–1716) doubted that the polynomial x 4 + c 4 could be<br />

split into two real factors <strong>of</strong> the second degree, 5 the validity <strong>of</strong> the result seemed for a<br />

moment in doubt. L. EULER (1707–1783) demonstrated in 1749 (published 1751) that<br />

the set <strong>of</strong> complex numbers was closed under all algebraic and numerous transcendental<br />

operations. 6 Thus, at least by 1751 it would implicitly be known that √ i = 1+i<br />

√ 2 .<br />

This made LEIBNIZ’S supposed counter-example evaporate, since he factorized his<br />

polynomial as<br />

x 4 + c 4 �<br />

= x 2 �<br />

− ic<br />

2�<br />

x 2 + ic 2�<br />

�<br />

= x − √ � �<br />

ic x + √ � �<br />

ic x + √ � �<br />

−ic x − √ �<br />

−ic .<br />

Numerous prominent mathematicians <strong>of</strong> the eighteenth century — among them no-<br />

tably J. LE R. D’ALEMBERT (1717–1783), EULER, and J. L. LAGRANGE (1736–1813) —<br />

sought to provide pro<strong>of</strong>s that any real polynomial could be split into linear and quadratic<br />

factors which would prove that any imagined roots were indeed complex. In the half-<br />

century 1799–1849 GAUSS gave a total <strong>of</strong> four pro<strong>of</strong>s 7 which, although belonging to an<br />

emerging trend <strong>of</strong> indirect existence pro<strong>of</strong>s, were considered to be superior in rigour<br />

when compared to those <strong>of</strong> his predecessors.<br />

Characterizing roots. <strong>The</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Fundamental <strong>The</strong>orem <strong>of</strong> Algebra were mostly<br />

existence pro<strong>of</strong>s which did not provide any information on the computational aspect.<br />

Other similar, nonconstructive results were also pursued. An important subfield <strong>of</strong> the<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> equations was developed in order to characterize and describe properties <strong>of</strong><br />

the roots <strong>of</strong> a given equation from a priori inspections <strong>of</strong> the equation and without<br />

explicitly knowing the roots.<br />

LAGRANGE’S study <strong>of</strong> the properties <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> particular equations was an<br />

<strong>of</strong>fspring from his attempts to solve higher degree equations through algebraic ex-<br />

pressions (see below). 8 LAGRANGE’S interest in numerical equations, i.e. concrete<br />

equations in which some dependencies among the coefficients can exist, can be di-<br />

vided into three topics: the nature and number <strong>of</strong> the roots, limits for the values <strong>of</strong><br />

these roots, and methods for approximating these. LAGRANGE made use <strong>of</strong> analytic<br />

geometry, function theory, and the Lagrangian calculus in order to investigate these<br />

topics. 9<br />

5 (K. Andersen, 1999, 69).<br />

6 (ibid., 70).<br />

7 GAUSS’ pro<strong>of</strong>s can be found in (C. F. Gauss, 1863–1933, vol. 3) and have been collected in German<br />

translation in (C. F. Gauss, 1890).<br />

8 (Hamburg, 1976, 28).<br />

9 (ibid., 29–30).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!