05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.5. General resolution <strong>of</strong> the problem by E. GALOIS 185<br />

Thus, GALOIS had characterized solvable irreducible equations <strong>of</strong> prime degree p<br />

by the necessary and sufficient requirement that their GALOIS group contained nothing<br />

but permutations corresponding to the linear congruences 53<br />

i → ai + b (mod p) where p ∤ a. (8.10)<br />

From this characterization <strong>of</strong> solubility, GALOIS deduced a second one which ABEL<br />

had also hit upon (see section 8.4), when he demonstrated his eighth proposition:<br />

“<strong>The</strong>orem. For an equation <strong>of</strong> prime degree to be solvable by radicals it is necessary<br />

and sufficient that any two <strong>of</strong> its roots being known, the others can be deduced<br />

rationally from them.” 54<br />

<strong>The</strong> character <strong>of</strong> GALOIS’ reasoning <strong>of</strong>ten left quite a lot to be desired. When LI-<br />

OUVILLE eventually published GALOIS’ manuscripts, he accompanied them with an<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> GALOIS’ clarity and rigour:<br />

“Clarity is indeed an absolute necessity. [. . . ] Galois too <strong>of</strong>ten neglected this<br />

precept.” 55<br />

In making GALOIS’ new ideas available to the mathematical community and in<br />

providing pro<strong>of</strong>s and elaborations <strong>of</strong> obscure points, mathematicians <strong>of</strong> the second<br />

half <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century invested much effort in the theory <strong>of</strong> equations, per-<br />

mutations, and groups. Although GALOIS had found out how the solubility <strong>of</strong> a<br />

given equation could be determined by inspecting the decomposability <strong>of</strong> its asso-<br />

ciated group into a tower <strong>of</strong> normal subgroups, a number <strong>of</strong> points were left open<br />

for further research. To mathematicians around 1850, three problems were <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

concern: GALOIS’ construction <strong>of</strong> the group <strong>of</strong> an equation was considered to be unrig-<br />

orous, no characterization <strong>of</strong> the important solvable groups had been carried out, and a<br />

certain arbitrariness <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> decomposition also remained. <strong>The</strong>se matters were<br />

cleared, one by one, until the theory ultimately found its mature form in the abstract<br />

field theoretic formulation <strong>of</strong> H. WEBER (1842–1913) and E. ARTIN (1898–1962). 56<br />

8.5.2 Common inspiration and common problems<br />

As mentioned earlier (p. 181), GALOIS and ABEL drew extensively on common sources.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ideas <strong>of</strong> invariance under permutations <strong>of</strong> the roots, founded in LAGRANGE’S<br />

work, 57 were important to both <strong>of</strong> them; and they both relied on the general theory<br />

53 (Scholz, 1990, 385).<br />

54 “Théorème. Pour qu’une équation de degré premier soit soluble par radicaux, il faut et il suffit que<br />

deux quelconques des racines étant connues, les autres s’en déduisent rationnellement.” (Galois,<br />

1831c, 69).<br />

55 (Liouville quoted from Kiernan, 1971, 77).<br />

56 (ibid.) and (Scholz, 1990, 392–398).<br />

57 (Lagrange, 1770–1771)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!