05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.3. <strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> irreducibility at work 159<br />

further comment. 43 By inserting into (7.15), ABEL found<br />

f (x) =<br />

P + Q · φ (x)<br />

. (7.16)<br />

N<br />

Next, he let x denote a common root <strong>of</strong> φ and f and concluded that x would also be<br />

a root <strong>of</strong> P = 0. However, if P were not identically zero, “this equation gives x as a<br />

root <strong>of</strong> an equation <strong>of</strong> degree less than that <strong>of</strong> φx = 0; which is a contradiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hypothesis. <strong>The</strong>refore, P = 0 and it follows that f x = φx · Q<br />

N .”44 Thus, it was obvious<br />

that f would vanish whenever φ did and, therefore, that any root <strong>of</strong> φ (x) = 0 would<br />

also be a root <strong>of</strong> f (x) = 0.<br />

ABEL put this important theorem to use in the very first description <strong>of</strong> the equa-<br />

tions treated in the Mémoire sur une classe particulière. If x ′ and x were two roots <strong>of</strong> the<br />

irreducible equation φ (x) = 0 among which a rational dependency existed,<br />

x ′ = θ (x) ,<br />

then every iterated application <strong>of</strong> θ to x would also be a root <strong>of</strong> this equation. ABEL’S<br />

demonstration followed directly from the theorem above. He argued that since it fol-<br />

lowed from the hypothesis that the equations<br />

φ (θ (x)) = 0 and φ (x) = 0<br />

had a root, x, in common, theorem 7.3 stated that for any root, y, <strong>of</strong> φ (x) = 0, θ (y)<br />

would also be a root <strong>of</strong> that equation. Once he had established this result, the argu-<br />

ment <strong>of</strong> ABEL’S paper was on its way, and the complex <strong>of</strong> conclusions described above<br />

could be obtained.<br />

ABEL turned the concept <strong>of</strong> irreducibility <strong>of</strong> equations, which had existed as an<br />

ad hoc tool before into a central foundation upon which a building <strong>of</strong> theorems could<br />

be established. 45 <strong>The</strong> irreducibility in ABEL’S sense was defined as minimality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

equation expressing the roots under the restriction that the coefficients must depend<br />

rationally on the same quantities as the original equation. From this definition, gen-<br />

eralizations were later made toward the general concept <strong>of</strong> domain <strong>of</strong> rationality. But<br />

working with this definition — and the division algorithm <strong>of</strong> EUCLID (∼295 B.C.) —<br />

ABEL demonstrated the important theorem 9 <strong>of</strong> divisibility, which in turn established<br />

the basic property <strong>of</strong> the class <strong>of</strong> equations studied in the Mémoire sur une classe particulière.<br />

46<br />

43 It had been explicitly employed in GAUSS’ second pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Fundamental <strong>The</strong>orem <strong>of</strong> Algebra (see<br />

section 5.7).<br />

44 “cette équation donnera x, comme racine d’une équation d’un degré moindre que celui de φx = 0;<br />

ce qui est contre l’hypothèse; donc P = 0 et par suite f x = φx · Q<br />

45<br />

N .” (ibid., 133,footnote).<br />

See also (L. Sylow, 1902, 23–24).<br />

46 (N. H. <strong>Abel</strong>, 1829c).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!