05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 9<br />

<strong>The</strong> nineteenth-century change in<br />

epistemic techniques<br />

Of the numerous transitions in epistemic techniques — changes in how mathematics<br />

was conducted — which took place in the 1820s, few were as far reaching as the ini-<br />

tiation <strong>of</strong> the movement aiming at rigorizing analysis through arithmetization. <strong>The</strong><br />

rigorization <strong>of</strong> analysis involved fundamental changes in the basic concepts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

discipline and also manifested itself on the technical level. <strong>The</strong> causal events leading<br />

to the rigorization are varied and span both external and internal factors. However,<br />

it is no coincidence that the rigorization was originally promoted in textbooks which<br />

were needed for the large-scale instruction in mathematics brought about by external<br />

events.<br />

Critical revision: A change in epistemic techniques. Central to the replacement<br />

<strong>of</strong> existing practice was the prominence given by leading research mathematicians<br />

to the rigorization program and the critical revision. J. L. LAGRANGE’S (1736–1813)<br />

textbooks marked a new awareness concerning the foundations <strong>of</strong> the calculus — later<br />

rigorization built upon the Lagrangian program.<br />

In the 1820s, A.-L. CAUCHY (1789–1857) presented his revision <strong>of</strong> the foundations<br />

<strong>of</strong> analysis which meant ingeniously revising the basic notions <strong>of</strong> the discipline. At<br />

the core <strong>of</strong> the change, CAUCHY discarded the eighteenth century conception <strong>of</strong> for-<br />

mal equality between expressions in favor <strong>of</strong> a new concept <strong>of</strong> arithmetical equality<br />

between functions. This change had implications for most <strong>of</strong> the other basic notions:<br />

limits, convergence, continuity, and differentiability to name but a few. For instance,<br />

CAUCHY was led by his new rigor to abandon attributing meaning to sums <strong>of</strong> di-<br />

vergent series and to promote tests <strong>of</strong> convergence into central positions within his<br />

theoretical framework.<br />

By the mid-1820s, N. H. ABEL (1802–1829) expressed severe concerns for the con-<br />

temporary state <strong>of</strong> the calculus: he felt that it lacked system and rigor. Simultaneously,<br />

ABEL revealed his interest in finding out how the previous generations could have ob-<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!