05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.5. CAUCHY’s pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the binomial theorem 215<br />

2. Series <strong>of</strong> general real terms (section VI.3)<br />

3. Series <strong>of</strong> complex terms (chapter IX)<br />

In each <strong>of</strong> these three theories, CAUCHY developed a product theorem, 20 and CAUCHY’S<br />

pro<strong>of</strong>s will be relevant when compared with ABEL’S subsequent pro<strong>of</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> multipli-<br />

cation theorems applying to series <strong>of</strong> real terms (the first and second) are the most in-<br />

teresting for the present study. In his theory <strong>of</strong> series <strong>of</strong> positive terms, CAUCHY had<br />

stated and proved that if two series ∑ un and ∑ vn were convergent and converged<br />

toward s and s ′ , the series whose general term was<br />

wk = ∑<br />

n+m=k<br />

unvm<br />

(11.5)<br />

would be convergent and converge toward the product ss ′ . When he wanted to gener-<br />

alize this theorem to general series <strong>of</strong> real terms, CAUCHY imposed the restriction that<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the series ∑ un and ∑ vn was to be convergent when their terms were replaced<br />

by their absolute values, i.e. both factors were to be absolutely convergent, although the<br />

term and an elaborate concept was only invented some years later (see section 12.7).<br />

In the first case, in which all terms were positive quantities, CAUCHY proved the<br />

theorem by a direct argument. He let s ′′<br />

n designate the sum <strong>of</strong> the first n terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

purported product series (11.5) and defined<br />

to obtain<br />

He had thus obtained<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨<br />

n − 1<br />

if n is odd<br />

m = 2<br />

⎪⎩ n − 2<br />

if n is even<br />

2<br />

n−1<br />

∑ wk <<br />

k=0<br />

n−1<br />

∑ wk ><br />

k=0<br />

�<br />

n−1<br />

∑ uk k=0<br />

�<br />

m<br />

∑ uk k=0<br />

sm+1s ′ m+1<br />

� � n−1<br />

∑<br />

vk k=0<br />

� �<br />

m<br />

∑ vk k=0<br />

�<br />

�<br />

< s′′<br />

n < sns ′ n,<br />

.<br />

and<br />

and by letting m grow beyond all bounds, the theorem was established.<br />

When he came to generalize this theorem to the case <strong>of</strong> general real terms, CAUCHY<br />

wanted to apply the simpler case <strong>of</strong> series with positive terms. With the same notation<br />

as above, he obtained the formula<br />

20 (ibid., 141–142,147–149,283–285).<br />

s ′ nsn − s ′′<br />

2n−2<br />

n =<br />

∑<br />

t=n<br />

∑<br />

m+k=t<br />

umv k, (11.6)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!