05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.5. RUFFINI’s pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the insolubility <strong>of</strong> the quintic 85<br />

Figure 5.4: PAOLO RUFFINI (1765–1822)<br />

on numerous occasions, and his final pro<strong>of</strong> published 1813. 74<br />

5.5.2 RUFFINI’s first pro<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> writings <strong>of</strong> RUFFINI were deeply inspired by LAGRANGE’S analysis <strong>of</strong> the solu-<br />

bility <strong>of</strong> equations described in section 5.2. 75 LAGRANGE’S ideas, concepts, and nota-<br />

tion permeate RUFFINI’S works; and on numerous occasions RUFFINI openly acknowl-<br />

edged his debt to LAGRANGE. 76 As LAGRANGE had done, RUFFINI studied equations<br />

<strong>of</strong> low degrees in order to establish patterns subjectable <strong>of</strong> generalization. Prior to<br />

applying his analysis to the fifth degree equation, RUFFINI propounded the corner<br />

stone <strong>of</strong> his investigation. Central to his line <strong>of</strong> argument was his classification <strong>of</strong> per-<br />

mutations. Founded in LAGRANGE’S studies <strong>of</strong> the behavior <strong>of</strong> functions when their<br />

arguments were permuted, RUFFINI set out to classify all such permutations <strong>of</strong> argu-<br />

ments which left the function (formally) unaltered. RUFFINI’S concept <strong>of</strong> permutation<br />

(Italian: “permutazione”) differed from the modern one, and can most easily be un-<br />

derstood if translated into the modern concept introduced by CAUCHY in the 1840s <strong>of</strong><br />

74 (Ruffini, 1813). <strong>The</strong> presentation <strong>of</strong> RUFFINI’S pro<strong>of</strong>s will largely rely on secondary sources, primarily<br />

(Burkhardt, 1892), (Wussing, 1969, 56–59), and (Kiernan, 1971, 56–60). In (R. G. Ayoub, 1980), his<br />

pro<strong>of</strong>s are interpreted using concepts from GALOIS theory.<br />

75 (Lagrange, 1770–1771).<br />

76 See for instance his preliminary discourse in (Ruffini, 1799, 3–4).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!