05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 11<br />

CAUCHY’s new foundation for analysis<br />

Against the background <strong>of</strong> J. L. LAGRANGE’S (1736–1813) algebraic foundation for the<br />

calculus, another and radically different program <strong>of</strong> rigorization emerged when A.-L.<br />

CAUCHY (1789–1857) set out to write a textbook suitable for his courses at the École<br />

Polytechnique. In a sense, CAUCHY’S famous textbook Cours d’analyse continues the<br />

Lagrangian program as its subtitle Analyse algébrique testifies, 1 but its contents consti-<br />

tuted a remarkable break with the Lagrangian system. In the Cours d’analyse, CAUCHY<br />

reformulated and revised the theory <strong>of</strong> infinite series from his novel viewpoint based<br />

on a shift in the conception <strong>of</strong> equality (see below). 2 Later, CAUCHY continued the<br />

reworking <strong>of</strong> the foundations <strong>of</strong> the calculus in two further textbooks dealing with the<br />

differential and integral calculus (see table 11.1).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Lagrangian foundation for the calculus relied on a notion <strong>of</strong> equality between<br />

functions (expressions) which was largely formal and had been inherited from L. EU-<br />

LER (1707–1783) (see chapter 10). In CAUCHY’S hands, the concept <strong>of</strong> equality shifted<br />

toward focusing on numerical or arithmetical equality: to CAUCHY, two functions<br />

were only equal if they produced equal numerical results for equal numerical values<br />

<strong>of</strong> the arguments. By way <strong>of</strong> a few central examples, I will document how this change<br />

<strong>of</strong> approach was implemented and what its consequences were.<br />

11.1 Programmatic focus on arithmetical equality<br />

Generality <strong>of</strong> algebra. Describing the methods used in the Cours d’analyse, CAUCHY<br />

stressed the way in which he had fought to obtain the standard <strong>of</strong> rigor which is char-<br />

acteristic <strong>of</strong> geometry by denouncing arguments relying on the “generality <strong>of</strong> alge-<br />

bra”. Such arguments could be, CAUCHY admitted, suitable inductions for obtaining<br />

1 (A.-L. Cauchy, 1821b).<br />

2 CAUCHY’S Cours d’analyse marks a turning point in the history <strong>of</strong> the calculus and has been given<br />

due attention by historians <strong>of</strong> mathematics. <strong>The</strong> most comprehensive presentation is probably BOT-<br />

TAZZINI’S introduction to a photographic reproduction <strong>of</strong> the Cours d’analyse (Bottazzini, 1990). In<br />

particular, the section entitled <strong>The</strong> “Generality <strong>of</strong> Algebra” (ibid., xliv–xcvii) is <strong>of</strong> direct relevance to<br />

the present discussion.<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!