05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13.4. More characterizations and tests <strong>of</strong> convergence 273<br />

would be convergent if α > 0. Thus, from a divergent series, ABEL had prescribed<br />

means <strong>of</strong> obtaining two derived series, one <strong>of</strong> which was divergent, the other conver-<br />

gent.<br />

In another section <strong>of</strong> the note, ABEL devised another way <strong>of</strong> obtaining a divergent<br />

series, which would lead him to a new test <strong>of</strong> convergence. ABEL found that for any<br />

continuous function φ (n) which increased without bounds for n → ∞, the series <strong>of</strong><br />

derived terms,<br />

would be divergent.<br />

∞<br />

∑ φ<br />

n=1<br />

′ (n) , (13.4)<br />

ABEL’S pro<strong>of</strong> proceeded from the Taylor series expansion <strong>of</strong> φ (to the second term<br />

and with remainder),<br />

φ (n + 1) = φ (n) + φ ′ (n) + φ′′ (n + θ)<br />

, for some 0 < θ < 1.<br />

2<br />

At this point, ABEL’S draft style made the precise assumptions <strong>of</strong> the ensuing de-<br />

ductions difficult to interpret. However, if ABEL’S requirements interpreted to mean<br />

φ ′′ (n) < 0, we obtain what was his next line,<br />

φ (n + 1) − φ (n) < φ ′ (n) .<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, the divergence <strong>of</strong> (13.4) followed by summation,<br />

φ ′ (n) > φ (n + 1) − φ (0) → ∞ as n → ∞.<br />

Subsequently, ABEL applied this procedure to prove the divergence <strong>of</strong> the series<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

n=2<br />

1<br />

n ∏ m k=1 logk for m integral,<br />

n<br />

where log k n = log log k−1 n. ABEL did so by defining<br />

and differentiating it to obtain<br />

φ ′ m (n) =<br />

φm (n) = log m (n + a)<br />

1<br />

(n + a) ∏ m−1<br />

k=1 logk (n + a) .<br />

As a consequence <strong>of</strong> the theorem stated above, the series (corresponding to a = 0)<br />

was divergent.<br />

∞<br />

∑ φ<br />

n=2<br />

′ m (n) =<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

n=2<br />

1<br />

n ∏ m−1<br />

k=1 logk n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!