05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

322 Chapter 17. Steps in the process <strong>of</strong> coming to “know” elliptic functions<br />

was a polynomial in x 2 and so was Q2n+1. Thus, with<br />

P2n+1 (x) = ax (2n+1)2 + · · · + bx and<br />

Q2n+1 (x) = cx (2n+1)2 −1 + · · · + d,<br />

ABEL found that the sum <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> the equation (17.1) would equal c aφ ((2n + 1) β).<br />

Furthermore, he already knew the complete solution <strong>of</strong> the equation (17.1), and thus<br />

he obtained<br />

φ ((2n + 1) β) = A<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

m=−n<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

µ=−n<br />

Similarly for the products <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> (17.1),<br />

φ ((2n + 1) β) = B<br />

n<br />

∏<br />

m=−n<br />

(−1) m+µ �<br />

φ β +<br />

n<br />

∏<br />

µ=−n<br />

�<br />

φ β +<br />

�<br />

mω + µ ¯ωi<br />

. (17.2)<br />

2n + 1<br />

�<br />

mω + µ ¯ωi<br />

.<br />

2n + 1<br />

<strong>The</strong>se formulae invited the limit process n → ∞, and it is interesting to see how ABEL<br />

carried it out.<br />

17.1.1 Determination <strong>of</strong> the coefficient A<br />

In order to determine the constant A <strong>of</strong> (17.2), ABEL wanted to insert a particular value<br />

for β and he chose β = ω 2 + ¯ω 2 i. However, this is a singular value (a pole) <strong>of</strong> φ, and<br />

ABEL applied a limit argument in the following form. First, using the relation<br />

�<br />

φ α + ω ¯ω<br />

+<br />

2 2 i<br />

�<br />

= − i 1<br />

ec φ (α)<br />

derivable from the addition formulae, ABEL found that for (m, µ) �= (0, 0),<br />

�<br />

mω + µ ¯ωi ω ¯ω<br />

φ<br />

+ +<br />

2n + 1 2 2 i<br />

� �<br />

mω + µ ¯ωi ω ¯ω<br />

+ φ − + +<br />

2n + 1 2 2 i<br />

�<br />

= 0.<br />

(17.3)<br />

Consequently, the sum reduced to the term corresponding to (m, µ) = (0, 0). For the<br />

last term, ABEL found that<br />

A = lim<br />

β→ ω 2 + ¯ω 2 i<br />

φ ((2n + 1) β)<br />

φ (β)<br />

=<br />

by (17.3) lim<br />

α→0<br />

φ (α)<br />

φ ((2n + 1) α)<br />

φ<br />

= lim<br />

α→0<br />

� (2n + 1) � ω<br />

2 + ¯ω 2 i + α��<br />

φ � ω<br />

2 + ¯ω 2 i + α�<br />

= 1<br />

2n + 1<br />

where tacit applications <strong>of</strong> the differentiability <strong>of</strong> φ and <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> l’Hospital are<br />

involved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!