05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.4. Continuity 233<br />

it followed that<br />

rm <<br />

and the inequality had been obtained.<br />

12.4 Continuity<br />

m−1<br />

∑ δ (εk − εk+1) + εmδ = δε0,<br />

k=0<br />

Just as had been the case with CAUCHY’S pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the binomial theorem, the concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> continuity played an important role in ABEL’S pro<strong>of</strong>. In his paper on the binomial<br />

theorem, ABEL gave rudiments <strong>of</strong> a different rendering <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> interaction<br />

between the concepts <strong>of</strong> continuity and convergence. ABEL’S definition <strong>of</strong> continuity<br />

seems to closely resemble CAUCHY’S (see page 216), although it may be noticed that<br />

ABEL’S definition is only formulated in the terminology <strong>of</strong> limits.<br />

“Definition. A function f (x) shall be called a continuous function <strong>of</strong> x between<br />

the boundaries x = 0 and x = b when for any arbitrary value <strong>of</strong> x between these<br />

limits, the quantity f (x − β) for ever decreasing values <strong>of</strong> β approach the limit<br />

f (x).” 27<br />

Although their definitions <strong>of</strong> continuity are almost identical, ABEL and CAUCHY<br />

attributed slightly different meaning to their concepts when they were employed. <strong>The</strong><br />

apparent ambiguity concerning the order in which quantification is to be made in<br />

CAUCHY’S definition was resolved in ABEL’S persistent insistence on point-wise def-<br />

initions. ABEL’S definition as stated seems just as susceptible to the ambiguity as<br />

CAUCHY’S, but ABEL throughout interpreted it to mean that a function is continuous<br />

at a point x ∈ [0, b] if f (x − β) → f (x) as β → 0.<br />

Combining continuity, convergence, and power series. <strong>The</strong> fourth and fifth theo-<br />

rems <strong>of</strong> ABEL’S binomial paper provided two important combinations <strong>of</strong> the concepts<br />

<strong>of</strong> continuity and convergence. <strong>The</strong> fourth theorem, Lehrsatz IV, stated and proved the<br />

continuity <strong>of</strong> a power series in the interior <strong>of</strong> its interval <strong>of</strong> convergence, while Lehrsatz<br />

V attempted to provide a rigorous replacement for what Cauchy’s <strong>The</strong>orem (see page<br />

217) had promised but not rigorously delivered. At this point, Lehrsatz IV together<br />

with its pro<strong>of</strong> will be described first, and Lehrsatz V will be postponed to be discussed<br />

in its proper context <strong>of</strong> ABEL’S famous Ausnahme or counter example to CAUCHY’S<br />

theorem (see section 12.6). At that point, the strong internal relations between the two<br />

theorems will also be described and explained.<br />

As his fourth theorem, ABEL stated and proved the following result which has<br />

become a classic <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> series and is <strong>of</strong>ten associated with ABEL’S name.<br />

27 “Erklärung. Eine Function f (x) soll stetige Function von x, zwischen den Grenzen x = 0, x = b<br />

heißen, wenn für einen beliebigen Werth von x, zwischen diesen Grenzen, die Größe f (x − β) sich<br />

für stets abnehmende Werthe von β, der Grenze f (x) nähert.” (ibid., 314).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!