05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

166 Chapter 8. A grand theory in spe<br />

could occur in the solution <strong>of</strong> a solvable equation. This characterization had been one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the points <strong>of</strong> objection to his impossibility pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1826 (see section 6.9.1). However,<br />

only the objections raised by E. J. KÜLP (⋆1801) were known to ABEL and ABEL did<br />

not react directly to them in the notebook. <strong>The</strong> characterization which ABEL presented<br />

in the notebook was only a limited version <strong>of</strong> the one found in the impossibility pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />

In the notebook, ABEL described the radicals from the outer-most one inward in the<br />

following form<br />

1<br />

µ 1<br />

2<br />

µ 1<br />

y = P0 + P1 · R1<br />

+ P2 · R1<br />

+ · · · + Pµ 1−1 · R1<br />

, (8.1)<br />

in which P0, . . . , Pµ 1−1 and R1 were rational expressions in known quantities and the<br />

1 1<br />

µ 2 µ 3<br />

other radicals R2<br />

, R3<br />

, . . . . In relation to the route he had taken in the impossibility<br />

pro<strong>of</strong>, he abandoned the concept <strong>of</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> algebraic expressions and imposed only<br />

the hierarchy from the concept <strong>of</strong> order which counted the number <strong>of</strong> nested root<br />

extractions <strong>of</strong> prime degree.<br />

ABEL introduced three notational concepts which he used throughout the prelimi-<br />

nary part <strong>of</strong> the manuscript to simplify his notation:<br />

1. He chose to denote algebraic expressions by writing their order as subscripts, for<br />

µ 1 −1<br />

µ 1<br />

instance writing Am for an algebraic expression A <strong>of</strong> order m.<br />

2. With y being <strong>of</strong> the form (8.1) and φ (y) = 0 an equation satisfied by y, ABEL<br />

chose to write the equation as φ (y, m) = 0 if all the coefficients <strong>of</strong> φ (y) were<br />

algebraic expressions <strong>of</strong> order m. Furthermore, he denoted the degree <strong>of</strong> the<br />

equation by δφ (y, m).<br />

3. Most importantly, he introduced a symbol ∏ Am for the product <strong>of</strong> all values <strong>of</strong><br />

Am obtained from attributing to the outermost radical in Am, R 1 µ , all its possible<br />

values, R 1 µ , ωR 1 µ , . . . , ω µ−1 R 1 µ (ω a µ th root <strong>of</strong> unity). Thus, if<br />

Am =<br />

the new symbol denoted the expression<br />

∏ Am =<br />

µ−1<br />

∑ pkR k=0<br />

k µ ,<br />

�<br />

µ−1 µ−1<br />

∏ ∑ pkω u=0 k=0<br />

uk R k �<br />

µ .<br />

Using these concepts and a number <strong>of</strong> immediate consequences derived from them,<br />

ABEL constructed and characterized the irreducible equation associated with a given<br />

algebraic expression.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!