05.01.2013 Views

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

RePoSS #11: The Mathematics of Niels Henrik Abel: Continuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

316 Chapter 16. <strong>The</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> inverting elliptic integrals<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> the previous result, ABEL’S investigations mainly concerned the division<br />

<strong>of</strong> the complete integral into an odd number <strong>of</strong> equal segments. He did so by first<br />

carrying out the division <strong>of</strong> the complete integral into 4v + 1 parts. ABEL’S argument<br />

was explicitly designed to make the case accessible with the Gaussian approach to the<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> cyclotomic equations. A brief outline <strong>of</strong> ABEL’S reasoning will provide a<br />

few interesting comparisons with GAUSS’ approach and the more general solution <strong>of</strong><br />

the problem found in ABEL’S paper on <strong>Abel</strong>ian equations.<br />

ABEL first assumed that 4v + 1 was the sum <strong>of</strong> two squares, 4v + 1 = α 2 + β 2 and<br />

found that α + β had to be an odd integer. In this case, he found an equation which he<br />

wrote as<br />

φ ((α + βi) δ) = x T<br />

S<br />

(16.12)<br />

with α = mδ, β = µδ, x = φ (δ), and T and S two entire functions <strong>of</strong> x4 . ABEL’S<br />

real objective was the considerations pertaining to δ = ω<br />

�<br />

α+βi for which he obviously<br />

found that x = φ (δ) = φ was a root <strong>of</strong> the equation T = 0. It thus became his<br />

� ω<br />

α+βi<br />

objective to solve this equation.<br />

Expressing the roots <strong>of</strong> T = 0. First, by his very powerful determination <strong>of</strong> the roots<br />

<strong>of</strong> φ (ξ) = 0, ABEL found that all the roots <strong>of</strong> T = 0 were related by<br />

(α + βi) δ = mω + µ ¯ωi = (m + µi) ω<br />

since ω = ¯ω for the lemniscate integral. Thus, any root was contained in the formula<br />

�<br />

m + µi<br />

x = φ<br />

α + βi ω<br />

�<br />

if m and µ were allowed to assume all integral values. However, in order to count<br />

each root only once, ABEL found that the set <strong>of</strong> roots <strong>of</strong> T = 0 could be listed as<br />

� �<br />

ρω<br />

φ<br />

α + βi<br />

for − α2 + β 2 − 1<br />

2<br />

≤ ρ ≤ α2 + β 2 − 1<br />

2<br />

(16.13)<br />

and he argued by an application <strong>of</strong> the Euclidean algorithm for integers: ABEL let λ, λ ′<br />

be determined by the equation<br />

and t denote an integer in order to obtain<br />

αλ ′ − βλ = 1,<br />

µ + β (µλ + tα) −α<br />

� �� �<br />

=k<br />

� µλ ′ + tβ �<br />

� �� �<br />

=k ′<br />

= 0.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, with ρ = m + αk − βk ′ , ABEL obtained<br />

m + µi<br />

α + βi<br />

= ρ<br />

α + βi − k − k′ i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!