17.01.2013 Views

WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology

WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology

WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

March, 2005 -73- 023-1289-003.3040<br />

potential to limit population growth in <strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong> where domestic exempt wells may be the best<br />

alternative or the only alternative for drinking water supply. The Planning Unit believes that<br />

establishing minimum instream flows to support in-stream needs and to protect senior water rights<br />

while also providing for rural development is a realistic and achievable goal.<br />

The Planning Unit feels that domestic exempt wells are important to support rural development and<br />

population growth in <strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong>. As a result, the Planning Unit discussed the option <strong>of</strong> making a<br />

recommendation to the Legislature not to condition exempt wells (as defined in RCW 90.44.050) to<br />

instream flows that may be set in the future. This recommendation was strongly supported by some<br />

Planning Unit members and strongly opposed by others. Since the Planning Unit operates by<br />

consensus, this recommendation was removed from the Plan. Further discussion resulted in the<br />

recommendation that in-house domestic use and normal stock watering from domestic exempt wells<br />

drilled after establishment <strong>of</strong> minimum instream flow rules not be restricted by these rules. "In-house<br />

domestic use" means use <strong>of</strong> water for drinking, cleaning, sanitation, and other uses in a residence,<br />

excluding irrigation <strong>of</strong> lawn and garden. The Planning Unit acknowledged that about 70% <strong>of</strong> water<br />

withdrawn by domestic exempt wells may be returned to shallow aquifer systems through a septic<br />

system or via percolation (USGS, 2000). In policy, <strong>Ecology</strong> considers a 50% return flow.<br />

In more rural watersheds such as the Pend Oreille, where public water systems are not available to<br />

many residents, permit-exempt domestic wells are relied upon for most residential water needs. The<br />

Planning Unit has attempted to plan for domestic exempt wells by setting up a framework that will<br />

include evaluating instream flows, and utilizing estimates <strong>of</strong> groundwater and surface water<br />

availability in sub-basins to develop a reservation(s) <strong>of</strong> water (per Chapter 590 WAC) to, in part,<br />

identify future reliable sources <strong>of</strong> water.<br />

Since <strong>Ecology</strong> has closed to further appropriation or placed low-flow restrictions on many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong> sub-basins with insufficient stream flow gaging information to support the closures (see<br />

Table 4-1 and Figure 4-3), the Planning Unit discussed the option <strong>of</strong> the Implementing Body<br />

addressing instream flow studies proactively in order to quantify how much water is needed for<br />

instream resources and to determine if additional water is available for future appropriation.<br />

The Planning Unit agreed that if an instream flow study indicates water is available for future<br />

appropriation, that the Implementing Body should consider placing this water within a reservation for<br />

future growth (per Chapter 590 WAC). This reservation, since it is set considering instream flow<br />

needs, would be senior to the instream flow rule and therefore would not be conditioned to the<br />

instream flow. The Planning Unit agreed that it should consider instream flow setting in the subbasins<br />

that are closed to further appropriation or restricted and in the sub-basins that are expected to<br />

experience the greatest population growth. As illustrated on Figure 4-2, these are the Calispell,<br />

Davis, Skookum, Kent and McCloud sub-basins. The types and amount <strong>of</strong> water appropriated in the<br />

reservation would be determined by the Implementing Body based on how the Implementing Body<br />

predicted growth to occur. For example, if growth is expected to occur primarily by domestic exempt<br />

wells, then a reasonable amount <strong>of</strong> water (less than the statutory 5,000 gallon per day allocation and<br />

considering water returns to the ground) would be applied to a domestic exempt well and based on the<br />

water available, a domestic exempt well limit would be set for the geographical area covered by the<br />

reservation.<br />

At such a time when the reservation is close to being allocated, there will be a need to follow a<br />

process to conduct more detailed water availability studies and/or to develop a mitigation framework.<br />

More detailed water supply studies could address: hydraulic continuity between ground water and<br />

surface water; development <strong>of</strong> an alternate water source (such as water withdrawal from a confined<br />

aquifer or withdrawal from the mainstem <strong>of</strong> the Pend Oreille River along with treatment and<br />

<strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong> <strong>WMP</strong> <strong>032305</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!