17.01.2013 Views

WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology

WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology

WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

March, 2005 -42- 023-1289-003.3040<br />

available, it is the intent <strong>of</strong> the Watershed Planning Unit to consider reserving this available water<br />

through establishment <strong>of</strong> a water reservation for future public water supply pursuant to Chapter 173-<br />

590 WAC. A copy <strong>of</strong> Chapter 173-590 WAC is included in Appendix F1. If instream flow studies<br />

indicate that water is not available for further appropriation during all or at particular times <strong>of</strong> the<br />

year, it is the intent <strong>of</strong> the Watershed Planning Unit to consider mitigation and alternative water<br />

supply management options such as water conservation, reclamation and reuse, water storage 1 , water<br />

rights transfers, water banking and development <strong>of</strong> alternate supplies (such as the mainstem <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Pend Oreille River). The Watershed Planning Unit considers this the first step in a sequential<br />

process.<br />

The Watershed Planning Unit acknowledges that instream flows may need to be developed for major<br />

tributaries within <strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong> to get a complete picture <strong>of</strong> water needs and water availability. In<br />

addition to the tributaries in the Planning Unit’s priority sub-basins, i.e. Calispell Creek, Davis Creek,<br />

Skookum Creek (both forks), Kent Creek and McCloud Creek, these include (in no order <strong>of</strong> priority)<br />

Indian Creek, Cee Cee Ah Creek, Mill Creek, Middle Creek, LeClerc Creek (all branches), Sullivan<br />

Creek, Flume Creek, Lunch/Sweet Creek, Cedar Creek, Big Muddy Creek, Little Muddy Creek, Lost<br />

Creek, SF Lost Creek, Tacoma Creek, Trimble Creek, Cusick Creek, Marshall Creek, Lower West<br />

Branch Priest River, Kalispell Creek, Granite Creek, Maitlen Creek, Gardiner Creek, and Harvey<br />

Creek. There are a few streams in <strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong> that are intermittent (i.e. are dry in summer months) in<br />

the headwaters, along sections or along their entire length. Whether or not these streams are<br />

intermittent in any particular year, depends upon the local climate and hydrogeology.<br />

4.1.3 QUANT-2b Background and Rationale<br />

Problem <strong>State</strong>ment: There is a need to ensure that the Watershed Planning Implementing<br />

Body is involved in instream flow studies, study recommendations and any instream flow rulemaking<br />

in <strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong>.<br />

Administrative rules regarding instream flows in <strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong> have not been established by <strong>Ecology</strong> in<br />

accordance with Chapter 173-500 WAC. In addition, during the watershed planning process the<br />

Watershed Planning Unit and Pend Oreille County Commissioners could not agree by consensus to<br />

take on the optional Phase II instream flow component. House Bill (HB) 1832 states that the funding<br />

for instream flow studies should be a priority and that <strong>Ecology</strong> will conduct instream flow<br />

assessments in areas where stakeholders have chosen not to address this component. RCW<br />

90.82.040(2)(a)(iii)(c) states, "If the initiating governments for a planning unit elect not to establish or<br />

amend instream flows as part <strong>of</strong> the unit's planning process, the department [<strong>of</strong> <strong>Ecology</strong>] shall retain one<br />

hundred thousand dollars to carry out an assessment to support establishment <strong>of</strong> instream flows and to<br />

establish such flows in accordance with RCW 90.54.020(3)(a) and Chapter 90.22." Chapter 90.22 RCW<br />

is included in Appendix F2. RCW 90.54.020(3)(a) states:<br />

(3) The quality <strong>of</strong> the natural environment shall be protected and, where possible, enhanced<br />

as follows:<br />

(a) Perennial rivers and streams <strong>of</strong> the state shall be retained with base flows necessary to<br />

provide for preservation <strong>of</strong> wildlife, fish, scenic, aesthetic and other environmental values,<br />

and navigational values. Lakes and ponds shall be retained substantially in their natural<br />

condition. Withdrawals <strong>of</strong> water which would conflict therewith shall be authorized only in<br />

1 The objective <strong>of</strong> water storage would be to minimize decreases in low summer streamflows, increase water<br />

supply reliability and meet future water demand. A broad range <strong>of</strong> concepts could be considered such as<br />

wetland and riparian enhancement, surface water impoundments, infiltration ponds, aquifer storage and<br />

recovery and direct discharge <strong>of</strong> groundwater for streamflow augmentation.<br />

<strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong> <strong>WMP</strong> <strong>032305</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!