WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology
WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology
WRIA 62 WMP 032305 - Washington State Department of Ecology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
March, 2005 -78- 023-1289-003.3040<br />
4.6 Background and Rationale for Economic Impact and Community Involvement Issues<br />
The following sections provide background information for the economic impact and community<br />
involvement issues.<br />
4.6.1 EC-1a Background and Rationale<br />
Problem <strong>State</strong>ment: There are insufficient resources to support implementation <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
actions in this plan.<br />
The Planning Unit acknowledged that there are insufficient Watershed Planning Phase IV funds to<br />
support implementation <strong>of</strong> all the actions in the Plan. As a result, the Planning Unit agreed that it<br />
would be important to prioritize actions for implementation and identify other potential funding<br />
sources to support Plan implementation. Appendix K provides information on potential funding<br />
sources that could be considered by the Implementing Body. A summary <strong>of</strong> the information is<br />
provided on Table 4-9.<br />
4.6.2 EC-1b Background and Rationale<br />
Problem <strong>State</strong>ment: There is a need to identify and inform local communities about resources<br />
to assist local communities in complying with water regulation.<br />
Members <strong>of</strong> the Planning Unit feel that, in some cases, it does not appear that regulatory agencies<br />
consider the cost to local communities <strong>of</strong> water regulation. Funds and technical assistance are not<br />
made clearly available to the local community to help them to comply with new water regulations.<br />
Concern was expressed that the cost associated with Federal, <strong>State</strong> and local water regulation is not<br />
clear to the local community. However, <strong>Ecology</strong> and the County (as per <strong>State</strong> law) are currently<br />
required to do a cost-benefit analysis for new regulation and these analyses are available to the public.<br />
In addition, the Watershed Planning Unit acknowledged that many <strong>of</strong> the Best Management Practices<br />
and specifications are written for the western <strong>Washington</strong> climate and are not always relevant to<br />
eastern <strong>Washington</strong>. The Planning Unit felt that there was a need to educate the public on water<br />
related laws and regulations and help them to comply with water regulation. The laws and<br />
regulations include (but are not limited to) bank stabilization, riparian management, wetlands,<br />
wellhead protection, critical areas ordinances and shorelines management. It will be the<br />
responsibility <strong>of</strong> the Implementing Body to compile a list <strong>of</strong> these laws and regulations and to<br />
develop educational materials to inform local communities. Information on potential funding sources<br />
to assist local communities comply with regulations are included within Appendix K.<br />
4.6.3 EC-2 Background and Rationale<br />
Problem <strong>State</strong>ment: There is a need to ensure meaningful community input to water<br />
regulations.<br />
This issue has two components: the first is related to how public input is addressed and the second is<br />
related to educating people so that they are able to be involved.<br />
Comment was provided by some Planning Unit members that the public <strong>of</strong>ten feel like second rate<br />
citizens when asked by agencies to comment. Often comments are not acknowledged and the public<br />
feel that their comment is a waste <strong>of</strong> time and that the decision has already been made irrelevant <strong>of</strong><br />
their concerns.<br />
<strong>WRIA</strong> <strong>62</strong> <strong>WMP</strong> <strong>032305</strong>