29.06.2013 Views

des tic et des territoires - Portail documentaire du ministère de l ...

des tic et des territoires - Portail documentaire du ministère de l ...

des tic et des territoires - Portail documentaire du ministère de l ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

communicate, management of uncertainties, reactivity<br />

to events, <strong>et</strong>c.). Knowledge and comp<strong>et</strong>ence<br />

themselves are becoming a direct factor of pro<strong>du</strong>ction.<br />

A significant feature for the future of work in<br />

the information soci<strong>et</strong>y is the shift from qualification<br />

requirements to comp<strong>et</strong>ence requirements.<br />

New forms of organisation supported by ICTs make<br />

the distinction b<strong>et</strong>ween qualification, skill or comp<strong>et</strong>ence<br />

less and less clear [Dubé & Mercure, 1997;<br />

Zarifian, 1996]. The usual distinction b<strong>et</strong>ween qualification<br />

and skill lies in the fact that qualification is<br />

attached to the workplace, while skill or comp<strong>et</strong>ence<br />

belongs to the worker. Qualification <strong>de</strong>pends on<br />

organisational options, human resource management,<br />

collective agreements and technology. Skill<br />

and comp<strong>et</strong>ence are related to e<strong>du</strong>cation, training<br />

and experience of the workers, and to their personal<br />

capacities.<br />

In the firms where ICTs are wi<strong>de</strong>ly implemented,<br />

the recruitment requirements and the <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>cription<br />

of functions are mainly based on comp<strong>et</strong>ence.<br />

This is an important shift from a collective to an<br />

indivi<strong>du</strong>al approach of qualification.<br />

Some authors go further in the analysis of such<br />

a shift from qualification to comp<strong>et</strong>ence.<br />

“Comp<strong>et</strong>ence appears as a substitution process; it<br />

challenges the recognition and validation of knowledge<br />

and know-how through the wage system.<br />

Comp<strong>et</strong>ence leads to a new mo<strong>de</strong>l of the “pro<strong>du</strong>ctive<br />

indivi<strong>du</strong>al”. It generates a specific mo<strong>de</strong>l of<br />

human resource management, not centred anymore<br />

on qualification and employment, but on the indivi<strong>du</strong>al.<br />

(...) Moreover, does the shift from the qualification<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>l to the comp<strong>et</strong>ence mo<strong>de</strong>l represent<br />

another shift, from wage earning to entrepreneurship<br />

? Are comp<strong>et</strong>ence and employability som<strong>et</strong>hing<br />

similar for entrepreneurship, as qualification<br />

and employment are for wage earning ? (...)<br />

Comp<strong>et</strong>ence can be un<strong>de</strong>rstood as a new form of<br />

bargaining qualifications, in a context of technological<br />

change and economic change”. [Brangier &<br />

Tarquinio, 1997]<br />

Comp<strong>et</strong>ence is often put forward when discussing<br />

the professional profiles of distance workers<br />

or teleworkers. More generally it seems that, whatever<br />

can be the sectors or the jobs, the use of<br />

advanced communication technologies increases<br />

the comp<strong>et</strong>ence requirements for the workers.<br />

Flexible Labour Mark<strong>et</strong>s<br />

Telework in the scenarios for the future of work<br />

It is an<strong>tic</strong>ipated that a key element in the information<br />

economy will be flexibility: of indivi<strong>du</strong>als, of<br />

organisations, of institutions and of soci<strong>et</strong>y in general.<br />

Flexibility is very much a portmanteau word,<br />

however, and carries many different meanings to<br />

different people. It is often suggested that flexibility<br />

will be a key element in enhancing economic comp<strong>et</strong>itiveness<br />

and that the future economic health of<br />

Europe will rely to a large extent on the ability of<br />

economic actors and supporting institutions to<br />

<strong>de</strong>velop such flexibility.<br />

Flexibility is generally used to <strong>de</strong>note a new<br />

organisational form, wh<strong>et</strong>her at the level of the firm<br />

or at soci<strong>et</strong>al level, contrasting this with those<br />

organisational system(s) generally known as Fordist<br />

or Taylorist, forms which are said to have characterised<br />

in<strong>du</strong>strial economies <strong>du</strong>ring the period from<br />

around the 1920 to the early 1970s. For the era of<br />

1980s and 1990s characterised by globalisation,<br />

increasing comp<strong>et</strong>ition, more dynamic mark<strong>et</strong>s,<br />

greater and more sophis<strong>tic</strong>ated consumer <strong>de</strong>mands,<br />

greater uncertainty, rapidly <strong>de</strong>creasing cycles of<br />

technological innovations, and the emergence of<br />

new information and communication technologies,<br />

it is argued that we need more dynamic and flexible<br />

organisational and institutional structures.<br />

Within this framework of flexible organisation,<br />

various scenarios of the future of work <strong>de</strong>velop new<br />

visions of the labour mark<strong>et</strong>. Beyond the classical<br />

labour mark<strong>et</strong> with a classical organisation of economic<br />

activities and “typical” workers’ status conditions,<br />

a lot of new forms of organisation and status<br />

conditions are <strong>de</strong>veloped, analysed or taken into<br />

account. Flexibility is a common character of these<br />

“atypical” labour mark<strong>et</strong>s. Some visions of the<br />

future of flexible labour mark<strong>et</strong>s are oriented<br />

towards social integration (through i<strong>de</strong>as such as<br />

plural economy, intermediary activities, quaternary<br />

sector, or transitional labour mark<strong>et</strong>s), while others<br />

lead to a growing indivi<strong>du</strong>alis<strong>tic</strong> culture (through<br />

i<strong>de</strong>as such as self-employment, self management or<br />

employability).<br />

Telework or distance working may belong to<br />

each type of scenario even if, in Europe, the ten<strong>de</strong>ncies<br />

seem also to be different from a country to<br />

another, with quite different ways of implementing<br />

flexible labour mark<strong>et</strong>s in the Nordic countries and<br />

in the rest of Europe.<br />

Flexible Labour Mark<strong>et</strong>s oriented towards<br />

Social Integration<br />

Unemployment and exclusion are more than a<br />

problem related to conjuncture. Soci<strong>et</strong>y is changing;<br />

social cohesion, work and its connection with<br />

growth are in a crisis. Insecurity is growing not only<br />

in the “peripheral” labour mark<strong>et</strong>s but also in the<br />

“core” labour mark<strong>et</strong>. Atypical employment is growing,<br />

precariousness and unemployment too, par<strong>tic</strong>ularly<br />

at the beginning and at the end of a professional<br />

career. In this soci<strong>et</strong>y, work can no longer be the<br />

only reference for the socialisation of indivi<strong>du</strong>als.<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!