19.01.2014 Views

PARTIE 2 - Icomos

PARTIE 2 - Icomos

PARTIE 2 - Icomos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Theme 2<br />

Session 2<br />

REPORT<br />

Senior rapporteur<br />

Laura Robinson<br />

Cape Town Heritage Trust (ICOMOS South Africa)<br />

EFFICIENCY<br />

Junior rapporteurs<br />

Maie Kitamura<br />

Heritage Architect, Ecole de Chaillot, Paris (France)<br />

Gong Xuelan<br />

Department of Project Management, Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute<br />

(China)<br />

The second session of this theme was entitled ‘Efficiency’. The overarching issue addressed by most of<br />

the speakers was that of sustainability within the broadest context. Speakers presented both scientifically<br />

informed studies into the technical performance of materials as well as specific case studies.<br />

Much of the concluding debate focussed upon the challenges posed by the stringent regulations enforced by<br />

authorities relating particularly to issues of health and safety. The regulations, when applied strictly within the<br />

letter of the law to historic buildings, sites and structures usually have a severely detrimental impact upon the<br />

integrity of the heritage resource.<br />

We were reminded of an earlier ICOMOS resolution stating that considerations relating to energy efficiency<br />

should not prevail over heritage considerations; similarly the discussion regarding the possible formation of an<br />

ISC for ‘Energy efficiency and historic buildings’, proposed by Peter Cox (ICOMOS Ireland) during the course of<br />

the ADCOM meeting held in Dublin in 2010, was recalled.<br />

ICOMOS was requested to facilitate in the debate in this regard between heritage professionals and the<br />

various authorities. Ultimately the aim should be to convince the authorities that these regulations, which are<br />

imposed in terms of the building codes, be relaxed so that appropriate solutions and methods may be used<br />

when intervening in heritage buildings. It had been suggested that authority for many heritage building should<br />

be devolved to the local authority who may well be better placed to assess the appropriateness of traditional<br />

and vernacular building techniques in particular.<br />

In concluding the session it was agreed that heritage and sustainability are indeed mutually supportive. The<br />

point had been during the course of the session that heritage conservation is the only strategy that is socially,<br />

environmentally and economically responsible. The restoration and re-use of heritage buildings and structures,<br />

and the use of traditional materials and building methods had proven to be as, if not more sustainable than<br />

contemporary buildings and new construction materials. This had been clearly demonstrated in the various<br />

case studies made during the presentations.<br />

377<br />

LE PATRIMOINE, MOTEUR DE DÉVELOPPEMENT<br />

HERITAGE, DRIVER OF DEVELOPMENT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!